no rules
no rules
You're viewing a single thread.
35 comments
-
Hmmm...seems too ambiguous - gotta use standard syntax, hold up...
^(s|t)?hey?(?!m)$
^t?h(e|i)(m|r)$
^t?h(e|i){1,2}r?s$Much better.
-
Passes:
- hey
- thim
- hees
-
shem
-
slaanesh will be pleased
-
-
Michael Jackson intensifies
-
Yeah I gave up on narrowing the scope, I ain't that dedicated to the bit
-
You’re not necessarily wrong for it. The source material is nonsense to begin with, so who’s to say what the right test cases are?
-
-
I don't see the problem.
-
^(they|he|she)$
-
Regex vibes
-
35 comments