Under Trump, AI Scientists Are Told to Remove ‘Ideological Bias’ From Powerful Models
Under Trump, AI Scientists Are Told to Remove ‘Ideological Bias’ From Powerful Models
A directive from the National Institute of Standards and Technology eliminates mention of “AI safety” and “AI fairness.”
You're viewing a single thread.
-
No, ai just needs to be shut down.
-
Why? Why should it be shut down?
Why didn't we shut down Gutenberg or Turing?
Ai isn't just the crap you type into chatgpt or Gemini going crazy with Google searches.
You know nothing about AI what it does and what it is.
-
Yes I do, and it's totally different than Gutenberg or Turing. But as soon as AI is programmed with "ideological bias" it becomes an agenda, a tool to manipulate people. Besides, it's training people to think less, and put in less effort. It will have long term negative effects on society.
-
This has been said about every significant invention ever.
-
Well, do you see where society is at now?
It seems like it has been subject to many long term negative effects over the past decade or so.
-
AI is a totally different ballgame, and I'm sure you know this.
-
-
A search engine also impedes your thinking.
-
Some search engines more than others!
-
But they always do.
-
-
-
This is how they tried to suppress the calculator in schools.
-
No you don't otherwise you wouldn't be saying any of this.
-
You are kind of getting upset, so I assume you work in the AI field in some way? I think the development of AI is interesting, intriguing, and opens many doors to many possibilities. But I still think it's a bad idea. It's not that I don't trust AI, it's that I don't trust humans, and they are the ones implementing AI.
Quote from Jurassic Park, that I think applies to AI well: "We were so preoccupied with whether we could, we didn’t stop to think if we should."
-
Don't make assumptions.
I'm actually an appliance repairman.
Making dinosaurs from mosquitoes is not the same as implementing new technology.
You can say the same thing about the first ape that picked up the first rock and beat his enemy to death with it. Should he have picked up that rock?
Let's not forget all those inventions made during war time for the purposes of killing that trickled down to various things we use everyday. Such as GPS, microwave ovens and duct tape.
Nobody asked us if we should we just did it.
Your statement about AI is closed minded and ignorant. You failed to see all the advancements that it's made currently in computing, medicine, research, software development.
Humans have an inherent need to survive and cooperate it is built into our DNA. There is a reason why we haven't killed each other with nukes yet.
Artificial intelligence will be the next step in human evolution it is absolutely inevitable.
-
You're free to feel that way, I just disagree and think we'd be better off without AI. Time will tell whether we should have put an end to it, or if it was a great invention.
-
-
-
-
-
Unless AI can find me a way to travel back in time to 2012 I really dont care about AI development AT ALL
-
Sending a Terminator to take down conservative characters throughout history would do the world good. The guys who shot Lincoln and President Garfield? Gone. Hitler? MyPillowed in the crib. The police who assassinated the Black Panther leadership? Reduced to ham cutlets before they can go to work.
Alas, we don't have a benevolent SkyNet to save us from cruddy outcomes. We will have to do it ourselves, in the now and future.
-
Congratulations. Your comment is less than worthless.
-
And your comment is quite rude.
-
He never said the commenter was worthless.
-
Yeah, but the problem is calling people's opinions worthless. Them's fightin' words. There are so many other ways one can phrase it without being blunt.
-
All he said was that he doesn't care and some other nonsensical stuff. This comment doesn't add anything. Not even an expression of an opinion.
But to be fair: the response doesn't add much either.
-
I have a completely different take. They're stating a personal preference (or an attitude rather than an opinion) that can resonate with other commenters. If I'm expressing something like that, my intent is to hopefully promote the idea to not give a damn so we can collectively move on. That's why I don't find it worthless at all.
The same can be applied to the reply: it's someone promoting the attitude of finding those opinions superfluous, but they're mean about it for whatever reason.
-
His comment is a contradiction that states a feeling that he may or may not be having. It adds nothing to the conversation supplies no opinion and has very little relevance to what we were talking about. The fact you were able to make up some bull crap about how you find his statement valid is absolutely amazing you should get into politics.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Come check out !news_summary@hilariouschaos.com
-
-
Trump too.
-