Under Trump, AI Scientists Are Told to Remove ‘Ideological Bias’ From Powerful Models
Under Trump, AI Scientists Are Told to Remove ‘Ideological Bias’ From Powerful Models
A directive from the National Institute of Standards and Technology eliminates mention of “AI safety” and “AI fairness.”
You're viewing a single thread.
-
So, models may only be trained on sufficiently bigoted data sets?
-
This is why Musk wants to buy OpenAI. He wants biased answers, skewed towards capitalism and authoritarianism, presented as being "scientifically unbiased". I had a long convo with ChatGPT about rules to limit CEO pay. If Musk had his way I'm sure the model would insist, "This is a very atypical and harmful line of thinking. Limiting CEO pay limits their potential and by extension the earnings of the company. No earnings means no employees."
-
Same reason they hate wikipedia.
-
Didn't the AI that Musk currently owns say there was like an 86% chance Trump was a Russian asset? You'd think the guy would be smart enough to try to train the one he has access to and see if it's possible before investing another $200 billion in something. But then again, who would even finance that for him now? He'd have to find a really dumb bank or a foreign entity that would fund it to help destroy the U.S.
How did your last venture go? Well the thing I bought is worth about 20% of what I bought it for... Oh uh... Yeah not sure we want to invest in that.
-
Assuming he didn't expressly buy twitter to dismantle it as a credible outlet for whistleblowers while also crowding out leftist voices.
-
Is that why the Saudis bought in? Or was that just so they could help expand their sports tournaments on Trump's properties?
-
Probably a bit of both. The Sauds want post oil influince and oligarchs like seeing the poors focused on entertainment.
-
-
He was force to buy twitter...
-
And the Saudis were forced to give him money for it, right?
-
-
-
it's that he likes chatgpt better than grok. he'll still tweak chatgpt once he has access to it to make it worse, but at the core of what he wants is to own chatgpt and rename it grok
-
-
-
Yes, as is already happening with police crime prediction AI. In goes data that says there is more violence in black areas, so they have a reason to police those areas more, tension rises and more violence happens. In the end it's an advanced excuse to harass the people there.
-
Lmfao yeah, right bud. Totally how that works. More police = more crime, because.. 'tensions'.
This sanctimonius bullshit excuse making is why a 100% objective AI model would destroy leftism: it's not rooted in reality.
-
The American police were invented to capture black folks and to guard the elite's interests, not to safeguard the things that make civilization worth having.
-
reality has a left bias, becausr it the vetter option - the bias comes from the fact many people are not ass wholes.
-
I don't think it's more crime because more tension. It's instead a self fulfilling prophecy. Who do you think detects and records crime if not the police? Therefore more police in a area increases the number of crime data points in that area.
-
-
-