Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)V
Posts
18
Comments
1016
Joined
2 mo. ago

  • A lot of people know that Catholic hospitals won’t perform abortions, but fewer know how radical that policy is. Even if you set aside elective abortions, patients who have ectopic pregnancies (and whose lives are at risk) would be in danger if they went to a Catholic institution.

    A normal hospital could give that patient a drug to induce an abortion... or just remove that fertilized egg through surgery. Not Catholic hospitals, though. They might make doctors remove a woman’s entire fallopian tube to prevent something fatal, reducing her ability to get pregnant in the future, even though it’s medically unnecessary, because that’s what their faith dictates.

    What if a woman has a miscarriage? That’s already emotionally draining, but Catholic hospitals make things worse. Normal hospitals might induce an abortion to make sure the embryonic tissue is removed from a woman’s body to prevent infection. Not Catholic hospitals. They require doctors to wait until a woman is infected before providing treatment.

    What about contraception? Catholic hospitals won’t dispense it. If a victim of sexual assault needs birth control immediately, and a Catholic hospital happens to be the one nearby, it may not help her. If there’s any chance the victim is already pregnant when the hospital sees her, that help is even less likely.

    Catholic hospitals also won’t perform vasectomies on men because those would interfere with natural pregnancies in the future.

    Nor will they help women who want to get pregnant by using a sperm donor.

    They also won’t help couples use a surrogatemother to give birth to their biological child because that would also be seen as “gravely immoral.”

    Catholic hospitals are equally awful at the other end of life. What if you’re an elderly person who is dying of a terminal disease, constantly in pain, and eager to end life on your own terms, peacefully, while you are able to make those kinds of decisions? Even in states where euthanasia, or death with dignity, is legal, too damn bad. You will just have to suffer. They will not assist you in those cases.

    Got caught up in these types of decisions with my first pregnancy that ended in miscarriage. Fuck the Catholic Church.

  • It’s traumatic but ok. I was willing to level with you here and have a conversation but clearly you just want to be rude.

  • simple avoidance of an unpleasant task

    You reducing reporting rape down to this is....inaccurate.

    But this wasn’t the only option and its timing may impact millions of lives.

    It was going to impact many lives regardless because Platner decided to run knowing he had all of this in his past.

  • Actually really good point, I meant to grab the original Washington Post link anyway. It's updated.

  • There's time for a replacement. But you're right, Platner fucked this up.

  • We'll trade one rapist for the next.

  • Me too, but attacking other victims isn't gaining you allies here.

  • I already told you that I agree with you as far as him not being a good candidate based on his past war crimes, but I can't continue a conversation where you're going to victim blame like this. It's disgusting.

  • He’s openly spoken about the war crimes he committed when he was there and claimed to have regretted it and repented.

  • You’d rather his victims stay silent and allow him to be elected?

  • He signed up for several tours as a private mercenary for hire in Afghanistan.

    Clearly he hasn’t changed as much as he claimed.

  • He sexually assaulted her.

  • How dare you have multiple conversations on a platform that encourages and revolves around people interacting and having conversations! /s

  • Do you think his on again off again girlfriend would have known as much about Nazi tattoos as the former mercenary?

    Stop victim blaming in here. I, for one, agree with you he was never a good candidate. Let’s cast blame where it belongs - on Platner.

  • How about you stop blaming his victims when they’re coming forward to inform the public about who Platner really is before getting elected.

  • I dug up his old Reddit comment about rape victims earlier because I was curious and couldn’t quite remember the details:

    “Holy fuck, how about people just take some responsibility for themselves and not get so fucked up they wind up having sex with someone they don’t mean to? Men and women, you make a choice to consume enough of a substance to lose your self control. So if you don’t want to be in a comprising situation, act like an adult for fucks sake.”

    He needs to drop out.

  • Y’all wanted to elect him to the Senate despite the Nazi tattoo, but you want to dog this woman for having an on and off again relationship with him?

    She still didn’t deserve to be sexually assaulted. He was the one to remove the condoms.

  • She has explained why she hesitated to come forward.

    “One of the reasons I didn’t come forward sooner was, the huge moral conflict that I had between supporting his politics, but not supporting him as a person,” she said. “I just want the truth out there. I just want people to have a whole scope of who he is as a person.”

  • Yeah it’s her fault he kept taking the condom off after promising to use one.

  • She estimated that Platner removed condoms without her consent at least six times when they had sex at both of their residences in D.C. during their two-year, on-and-off relationship. She said she told him that she was upset about it but that he would make light of the situation.

    “I confronted him both during and after [sex] because he knew that I was not on birth control and how dangerous that was,” she told The Post in one interview. In another, she said: “He would act like cute about it, like ‘Oh sneaky me.’”