The short answer is no. Outside of this context, I'd say the idea of "code modifications algorithmically at scale" is the intersection of code generation and code analysis, all of which are integral parts of modern development. That being said, using LLMs to perform large scale refactors is stupid.
Haven't been cooking for myself in a while, so these are all paid experiences:
The mexican food in my city has been historically been lacking, but recently I tried some birria tacos that I liked. Well, really what I liked was the "consomme" that they serve the tacos with, but hey, the tacos were good too.
I had a really good tiger prawn a few days ago. Perfectly grilled over open wood flame, so it was a little smoky, and finished with what I'm guessing was a prawn-based bisque.
I've been going to a wonderful little cocktail bar where all their cocktails are well-designed and tasty as fuck.
Your premise is total bullshit. That being said, I'd prefer a world where nobody reads papers and journals stop existing to a world where we are boiling the oceans to rubber-stamp papers.
A story of no real substance. Pharmaicy, a Swedish company, has reportedly started a new grift where you can give your chatbot virtual, "code-based drugs", ranging from 300,000 kr, for weed code, to 700,000 kr, cocaine.
editor's note: 300000 swedish krona is approximately 328,335.60 norwegian krone. 700000 SEK is about 766116.40.
A bunch of big hollywood people have started “creator’s coalition on AI”. A snarky summary of their mission: “let’s figure out how we can work with the fascists!”
Can confirm. This was like if the pope walked into an r/atheism meetup and showed his texts saying "dw bro, I'll just move you to a different diocese, btw this totally isn't about the allegations wink wink"
I believe he was trying to explain why it looked like MIRI had paid money out to an alleged sexual abuser. The analogy was constructed something like this:
A and B work at a company C
A has conflict with B.
C decides to fire B.
unrelated to 1, 2, or 3, B has a wife D, who dies in mysterious circumstances, leading A to strongly believe that B killed D.
The police, E, perform an investigation and decide not to pursue a case against B
C pays out B's severance, unrelated to 2, 4, or 5.
Don't blame me or how I remembered this if this doesn't make sense.
Chromefox: the Sonichu of FOSS