Fellow Debian user ricing my daily driver here. Other people may call me crazy too
that makes two of us!!
I’ve mostly come to terms with it by reminding myself that most people are either blissfully ignorant or too busy to care.
Active meta ignorance, making yourself be ignorant of the ignorance of others. Which is the same as ignorance but implemented as an abstraction :P
Have you considered making a sort of Honestly, I have not. I don't do much with sharing stuff on my GitHub since my programming stuff usually doesn't exceed a handful of scripts save for when making websites. install script or even just a public repository for your tweaks?
The whole idea of putting all the changes I made to my system is daunting since it's quite a lot even though it isn't that finicky at the smaller scales. I wouldn't know where to begin and I take it it takes a few weeks to get a basic structure going that feels comfortable. I'll try it though! Thank you for the good suggestion
Let's say you make rice more than twice a week. Rice cookers can save a stupid amount of time. They're cheap, reliable and you can use them not just for rice, but also a bunch of other stuff. My advice, try one if you like rice.
Ricing Debian is as easy as on any other Distro. Most people I know are using Debian AND (Cinnamon/GNOME OR Xfce). Those are maybe a bit annoying to modify and make your. KDE however works like a charm and people think I'm using Arch because it looks unlike anything the way I'm using tiling.
Props though for getting people to switch, you're a real one.
From my experience, without majorly reconfiguring the machine, virtual machines, RSS and making your own programs can be rather time-consuming, though also carrying a challenge you may be lacking as is now.
Exactly that is time excellently spent. Aside from the obvious hobbyist character, this has extremely wide real-world applications. I love that you guys are talking me into modifying kernels :D
What does this word mean? Does this refer to something that does not exist? If so why are we using it as a practical benchmark or distinction to make statements about the world?
but they should actually get credit for how often they get it right too.
My text compression algorithm for tape gets the facts right to the exact character. Beat that.
It's a convenient way of looking at things. Saying that it's good at one thing and bad at others. What I have come to realize with LLMs is that anywhere where experts deal with them, they are very aware of their shortcomings with respect to someone's area of expertise. Sure, you might say they're good at producing text, yet a journalist or someone who simply writes a ton might be able to spot generated text in an instant. The same way a photographer or painter can spot these statistical methods instantly. Rinse and repeat for coding, translation, medicine and all other tasks specific to current societal roles.
That is not to say that you need to be an expert to spot LLMs or other generative ANNs, it comes down to attention and what you condition yourself to be attentive to. Of course pictures or code, or whatever will be convincing if you treat these things as secondary, like a doctor would treat creative writing as secondary to their job though necessary or a biologist would treat writing python scripts.
that makes two of us!!
Active meta ignorance, making yourself be ignorant of the ignorance of others. Which is the same as ignorance but implemented as an abstraction :P
The whole idea of putting all the changes I made to my system is daunting since it's quite a lot even though it isn't that finicky at the smaller scales. I wouldn't know where to begin and I take it it takes a few weeks to get a basic structure going that feels comfortable. I'll try it though! Thank you for the good suggestion