panda_abyss @ panda_abyss @lemmy.ca Posts 0Comments 53Joined 5 days ago
Before the second Trump era, it would’ve been seen as a ridiculous violation of the First Amendment to have some kind of monitor making sure the media was being nice to the president.
No. No, it is ridiculous. Don’t pretend it’s fine.
I hope Matt Stone and Trey Parker create no end of shit for Paramount/CBS.
RIP America.
All I’ve got is a nubby yubikey nano
Just having user agent header based attestation would work for most people.
It would be easy to bypass sure, but kids are boomer levels of tech illiterate these days.
Parents should be setting up content restrictions, the government has no place making us submit ask to view porn.
The failure of parents is not my problem.
Probably doesn’t floss.
This is 100% going to be used against trans people, especially the mental illness and danger parts (remember all the cross dressing is pedophilia stuff that republicans were pushing)
I hope for the safety of all LGBTQ people in the US right now, especially the trans people. You all deserve to live unbothered, I wish it were that easy.
To be fair, I’m not sure why firebase even has a public access option. That’s a recipe for issues.
Though if it’s anything like Google Cloud Store, they hopefully make it very clear that your bucket is public.
More bytes for Ur buck?
You guys have Babylonian deer?
But anything the US feds contracted them for, like building data centres, they have to comply or they face penalties and have to pay all the costs back.
10 days ago, a week before this was announced, they awarded $200M contracts each to Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and xAI
This doesn’t doom the public versions, but they now have a pretty strong incentive to save money and make them comply with the US governments new definition of truth.
Why does it keep telling me the bowl is empty and it’s starving? I feed it this morning.
You’re not tricking me with those discount dice
I’ve been warned your tricks!
Yep, and 2x64gb RAM
What do they do with the daddy computers? All of mine only have female ports.
I would be fine with not charging workers under 18 tax.
When I was that age saving for university wasn’t easy and staying life off with a bunch of debt and no guaranteed job isn’t fun.
The first few iterations were good, when they went mass market they let quality go.
Yeah, sadly SpaceX and Tesla are both very promising companies primarily held back by Elon Musk.
Canada's OAS and CPP are not a pyramid scheme, they're based on what you actually put in and guaranteed.
They don't have the solvency issues that US Social Security has.
A lot of 80/90 year olds have family they love.
I get what you're saying, but I don't think letting 16 year olds vote is the right move.
The reason I think every department needs an internal tech team is precisely because "just throwing tech" doesn't work. We need bespoke tailored solutions to the specific problems that workers are dealing with.
Now if we add government tech procurement standards - I see no hope in tech at all as surely winner of any contract will deliver past due date, over budget and with missing features.
This is exactly the problem having internal teams building internal tools solves. You're not stuck waiting to go from 0 to 100% on an expensive project with long runway and out of date standards until finally the consultants to toss a solutoin over the fence and leave because they want to get the minimum done and move on to their next paycheque.
You can only do tech really well by understanding the domain and problem, and the people working on it.
I definitely think we should be going big on both OSS and Canadian owned tech. I don't expect the government to build Office, they should be using (and ideally contributing to) OSS. On the other hand, Statistics Canada has a ton of open sourced code that might as well be closed source, and would probably help them move quicker.