In my previous relationship we did that, as my ex was even more conflict adverse, so we decided arguments can take as long as we want (could transition the argument to text).
There is an end to end encrypted feature, with a 6 digit pin to decrypt the keys I believe. a 6 digit pin isnt the most secure, but its better then nothing for typical conversations.
Annoyingly there is a feature that u can summarise texts with using AI, which ofc breaks privacy, but u can turn off message sharing (meaning you and the other person can no longer do that)
A few glaring alarm bells around privacy on messenger, but again, better then nothing.
The toxicity of instagram and the hollow content on facebook made me delete them. I still have messenger however, since convincing people to install signal is difficult, and also it is useful to communicate with new friends (considering the alternative is unencrypted sms)
Interest rates are one lever that can be pulled to try and produce an effect to control inflation/unemployment/economic growth. Ignore any advocation for removing it.
Imo tho, we have relied far too much on it to get us out of economic crisis (i.e. covid, where interest rates were 0.1% and then looots of inflation afterwards). A good budget goes a much further way to solve it and its effects are long term.
Sometimes when I notice a particularly dysphoric thing in a man (i.e a beard) I cant help but think "how the hell do you put up with that??" So yeah, I very much project, however I've been conciously stopping since it isnt good for me nor the random man whom I am judging.
For the future of societies' sanity, an ai purge is so needed. My parents were watching an ai generated mini documentary (the script was clearly ai gen), and it was so god awful
It depends on the evidence for the accusation just like anything else. I admit, for most accusations I don't have time so just move on. For more serious accusations, I would think about it more whether its true.
Sometimes the US makes shit up, sometimes it doesn't. Same with China. I just have to take the time to determine if the evidence is sound, at least in principle.
I don't know those terms tbh because Im just some pleb. i would welcome some simple explanation of it.
Wikipedia asserts "300 to 2700" dead, with the CCP asserted toll (according to wikipedia) being 241. That isn't a peaceful dispersion, and, while not 10,000 people, is still a massacre.
I just don't understand how events like this doesn't substantially taint your image of them, in the same sense the stolen generation policies (for my country, Australia) are massive stains on my countries' histories that we havent fully contented with.
But trying to relate it to what I my original comment, I worry about denials of mistakes that countries have made, results in failing to see their current mistakes. In particular aswell, seeing what would normally be considered a grave immoraility, to be seen in a much more positive light because its anti western imperialism.
What I am saying aswell, is this also distorts the truth of events or facts, in a similar manner to an average western citizen's truth because of their aversion to china.
In my previous relationship we did that, as my ex was even more conflict adverse, so we decided arguments can take as long as we want (could transition the argument to text).
It worked well enough I suppose.
But yeah, it doesnt pop up much