ipitco @ ipitco @lemmybefree.net

Posts

1

Comments

120

Joined

1 wk. ago

the same way nobody forces you to work at mcdonalds and shit

but sometimes you just can't take the risk to lose your job

Many are probably not in this situation though

Downvoting comments I don’t agree with doesn’t seem that bad either

It’s useful to show that not everyone thinks the same. When I see controversial comments and posts, it sparks my curiosity and I start really thinking about it

I still fail to see how anarchism inherently wants to make salaries and income more even

That’s an extension that belongs to a branch of anarchism, it is not supposed to be like this by definition

lemmy devs probably thought it was important enough to add then

It's easier to censor moderate lemmy.ml this way

USA is already at nightmare level, and the big difference is the USA will use it against you where China can't really reach you

Anyways, I would appreciate any proof or comparison between the two

In part as well. There are many things that have built up over time, this whole post made me realize I had enough

The wikipedia definition doesn't seem to agree with what you're saying.

• Not wanting people to downvote what they don't agree with
• Easily consider things as brigading and vote manipulation
• Easy censorship on specific subjects (including anti AI even though anti AI people are annoying from time to time)
• Fear of not being able to criticize db0's administration

How does it compare to tesla in terms of privacy, ownership (DRM) and stuff?

It ends up more as an opinion circlejerk than a safe space.

When you ban people disagreeing with you, you're not making anyone feel safer, you're just comforting yourself in a confirmation bias group where only one voice can be heard

When you ban people by stating they're transphobic when they're not, you're being authoritarian and misleading. It ends up with active misinformation because either you're with them, or you must fuck off. A sect.

When the concept of a safe space goes from no judgment and kindness to a political space, I believe it will have a negative impact.

But maybe it's just me being pissed off at the abusive moderation

Income inequalities don't implicitly imply a hierarchy in terms of authority over other people

Anarchism mainly rejects the state's hierarchy. It doesn't make it left or right

Also knowing that left and right will often rely on the state to push their ideas and rules

both are often linked

Enforcing your opinion while banning people not agreeing is pretty authoritarian to me

blahaj is authoritarian. Them not liking tankies doesn't mean they're not the exact same with their ideas. Ada is a perfect example of this.

!196@lemmy.world doesn't exist for no reason

Ehm... no?

Why would you always assume the worse? That's a great way to get offended at anything and to easily censor people while only giving your narrative

It's not lemmy, it's just how the fediverse works to prevent double voting

Mastodon also being on ActivityPub, that's really likely the same thing, except maybe not implemented in the UI, but that could be accessed by the API or in the DB

for db0 it might be as frankly I don't know, it was just a feeling that I have, that they're more open towards liberalism

But for blahaj, up left seems like the correct spot

Woke, pro freedom of gender/identity, progressive; so most of the time left

Authoritarian, huge voice, strict on voicing their opinions and rules on the subject. You either agree or you're banned. So authoritarian