Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)G
Posts
7
Comments
432
Joined
4 mo. ago

  • This data would be nearly worthless for AI training, since it's random and repetitive. You would need to record significant portion of time to avoid model poisoning. Who would be reviewing that data?

    Why would government want that data?

    Occam's razor: The purpose of this law is exactly what lawmakers say it is.

  • That worked, thanks

  • I don't get it. Why the other person, presumably their boss, asked them to take a day off?

  • What is better solution in your opinion?

    Remember that margin in 2024 election was so thin that only 300 000 extra votes (in right states) would be enough for Trump to lose, only little over 2 million for Kamala to win on numbers.

  • What if it's just a case of police brutality and the victim just happen to be autistic?

    403 error when accessing the article

  • Chad EU does based things as always.

    For all the sceptics: How would that data be send and where it would be storen and for what purpose?

    1080p stream in acceptable bitrate is around 1MB/s. Assuming average driver drives 1 hour daily, that is 4GB/day/car, or more than 1TB/year/car. VW group sells around 4 millions cars per year, so assuming 10 years lifespan, that's (4 million times 10 times 1TB) 40 Exabytes of data you need to store per year. For context, that's 2% of total storage market capacity.

    Okay, but that's absurd, nobody is going to store that data, I hear you say.

    Let's assume no data is stored on servers. Instead, all that data is just send to them, so they can do whatever malicious shit is on agenda this week.

    Maintaing 1MB/s stream is not a trivial task, especially if you want to do that for free. I might've slightly underestimated the core of the problem, it's completely impossible to do that. One may argue that they could create new infrastructure or pay existing cellular networks, but that's an absurdly expensive task.

    And at last: Why would car manufacturers even consider doing that? What is the purpose?

  • Bombing is bad, but is not genocide, unless you deliberately and continuously target selected group of civilians.

    What are those three nations or groups the US has genocided in recent history.

  • "Internal problem" my ass.

  • I see

    1. This was very long ago
    2. There was a bigger enemy
    3. "Liberal Fascist" wdym, those were normal politicians chosen in democratic elections 4.Not all right wing authoritarianism is fascism
  • Because they're not actively genociding any nation?

  • Funny, but manipulative

  • Thanks

  • Source?

  • Then fine, it's your money and your productivity