everybody knows that you can't trust wikipedia for topics where a third-party might profit from manipulating what's written in the article, such as a company brand might remove criticism from its page. this is basic knowledge i think (or at least i hope)
i've become convinced that it's mostly about the birthrate. people want their kids to have many kids again, but that's less likely if the kids are gay.
i've long suspected that the real reason why we can't have a casual sleepover at our neighbor's is because it would weaken parent's total control and ability to pressure their children to adhere to stupid commands.
i mean it depends on how you define work. if you go by this definition, then basically any mechanical movement (as long as the force is non-zero) is work. therefore, just standing up in the morning, is work.
look i know that this gets a lot of hate but the current trajectory of "you need to prove your worth to the world to have a legitimate reason to exist" is just not sustainable. fuck all that "we support that artist", we should be supporting the person, whether they output art or not.
the current rage against AI is 90% driven by the idea that humans need to produce output sothat we can donate to them and give them money sothat they can live. and frankly, that's a dystopian idea in my eyes.
let's calculate: mayflower in 1618 to today, roughly 2018 is about 400 years. first child was mostly had around age 22 for most of that time, so that makes 400 / 22 ≈ 18 generations if you're descended from a long row of first-borns.
i mean this tell you everything that you need to know: as soon as the animation quality of a channel is good enough, it gets accused of being AI. what does this tell us about the quality of AI output?
uuh enjoying a day in the summer i see >.<