Unruffled [they/them] @ Flatworm7591 @lemmy.dbzer0.com

wiki-user: unruffled

---

Read more

Posts

438

Comments

664

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

I thought hexbear used an allowlist rather than a blocklist, but could be wrong about that.

I don't know what we'd do without you fxomt! Appreciate you buddy.

dude c'mon

That fat slice of onion looks brutal af.

How can I explain this to you? If those few "Democrats" hadn't voted for it, it wouldn't have passed.

The SAVE Act passed 220–208, with Democrats Jared Golden, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, Henry Cuellar, and Ed Case voting in support of a bill that could disenfranchise millions of voters.

People don't expect anything different from the Republicans, but for some reason folks have higher expectations of the Democrats, despite decades of soul crushing disappointment.

BPR & YDI. It's perfectly reasonable to disklike .ml's moderation practices, but you effectively went into their community just to troll them about it. What did you expect to happen? 7 days seems reasonable to me, and it's only a community ban.

Thanks for the report. fyi those two instances are blocked from federating with dbzer0.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

It's a pointless exercise to argue about definitions. The author clearly meant something more like the type of liberal that Phil Ochs is singing about in Love me, I'm a Liberal. If you give it a listen, you'll get the gist...

Sure thing doc, I'll add you :)

PTB, fuck Reddit.

Yeah, it's the new exploding heads.

Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Please resubmit with the all relevant info included, thanks.

I don't know if traitor is the right word. I see support for AES states as reprehensible because i don't see any virtue in dictators running the world, even if their countries were once communist.

Imo, support for AES authoritarian states is one of the main sources of friction between Marxists and Anarchists. It's ideologically dishonest to suggest otherwise. Especially since most AES states are now capitalist in most respects. If you guys would drop the AES support then left unity might stand a chance.

It’s a Left-unity instance for Marxists and Anarchists (who like to simp for authoritarian AES states).

Fixed it for ya.

PTB. OPs comments are factually correct, even if they are too unpalatable for a liberal audience to accept. We have to assess politicians by their behaviour, not by their lies, and on that basis Kamala absolutely supports the US prison industrial complex aka slave labor. As do all establishment Democrats, who have helped foster this disgusting industry just as much as the Republicans have.

OPs rhetoric on this is actually very chill, considering.

You got some receipts from that specific community or are you just talking in general?

Hey buddy, sorry for your loss.

Just by way of reassurance, I think what you are feeling is very normal in this sort of situation and your experience is very relatable to me.

With all respect to you, Logic does not work with vibes.

Tbh that's a bit like saying, "I mean no offence, but fuck you in the face", lol. Here's three clear examples:

• The headline paragraph argues that European leaders are delusional and are responsible for escalating tensions with Russia. And that Putin only wants peace. This is a classic Russian disinfo trope to open with, and is in complete denial of reality.
• Author blames NATO and the US for "provoking" Russia to invade Ukraine. This argument requires us to accept that Ukraine has no right to self determination simply by virtue of having Russia as a neighbour.
• They accuse Europe of taking a "warmongering stance" when it's Russian military aggression that is provoking all the increased military spending.

I mean, it's just laughably campist nonsense designed to convince people the country that brutally invaded it's neighbour is the innocent victim here, and everyone else in Europe is a warmonger simply for helping Ukraine to resist the invasion. These are all common Russian state media talking points, that's why it's propaganda.

Again, I highly respect you. But your opinion does not make any sense to me.

Same