Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C
Posts
5
Comments
53
Joined
2 yr. ago

Web Developer

  • Thanks for this. I hadn't considered it but it seems like a really obvious thing now you've said it .. testament to a good idea I think! I'll add it.

  • No worries, I appreciate the feedback! I was afraid that these posts would go without a single discussion!

  • I've built in the ability to hide categories for this kind of reason. I was thinking, for instance, that people who enjoy a good moan can join the "Moaners Club" category, and the rest of us can hide that category from our feeds to get on with the categories we enjoy. Regarding problematic moderators, I have built a moderation log to keep them accountable, and of course, if they don't show themselves to have good intentions, those with good intentions could create their own instance -- I don't know why I'm going into this kind of detail -- you're on Lemmy after all, you know the score!

  • Now that's an interesting idea!

    This release is step one in the plan. Federation is step two! More information on this here: https://carlnewton.github.io/posts/building-habitat/

    I love what activitypub has done for the internet, but I don't think it will be right for this project, but yes to federation -- if there are instances to federate with of course!

  • Awesome! Let me know how you get on!

  • Ha! Funnily enough I just responded to a different comment along these same lines: that's the beauty of the fediverse. If a community of moaners exist, they could have their own instance. Or in the case of Lemmy (and the very theoretical Habitat), their own categories that other users can tune out from. I think you're going to have places in which moderation is a success and places in which it isn't. Anything that isn't moderated appropriately and gets taken down as a result of something actually illegal won't affect the communities that are appropriately moderated, because it can all be separated. It seems to be working well enough for Lemmy.

  • I think that's the beauty of the fediverse though. Any community can be anything you want it to be. If some users don't like how an instance is being used, they could create a competing instance that's more aimed that their wants and needs.

  • Thanks for this. Perhaps invite only could work. When I signed up to my Lemmy instance, I was asked to say something nice about the UK to prove that I wasn't a bot. I imagine this could work with a local quiz. But I personally favour the idea of it being open and communities being so small that it wouldn't really benefit anyone to abuse. But it would certainly be nice to have the administration tools to quickly put a stop to it if it does occur. Something to think about. Thanks

  • I can't seem to find anything relevant when I search for Topix, but I think we learn to moderate our local communities effectively. Just like here on Lemmy. The difference being that owners will have fewer people to moderate, so it should in theory be easier. If an owner is vile, create a competing instance.

  • I hadn't heard of Yikyak, but it looks very similar to my mock-up. Thanks

  • Yes, I discovered this for myself yesterday after getting a lot of suggestions that it won't catch on. I can do my best to foster my own community. If others do the same, that's a bonus!

  • Hey, I've been looking into the idea of using population density as an indicator of how big a community should be, but it didn't feel right that the platform would be deciding the boundaries of each community. I then thought about the idea that the owner, upon setup, would draw a shape on a map that would indicate the boundaries of their desired community. How do you feel that solution would that solution work around your river?