artyom @ artyom @piefed.social Posts 0Comments 64Joined 2 mo. ago
You didn't answer anything about why they would care about PR. Is it your position that people would stop using CCs because some entity got noisy about them being used to buy pr0n?
a government agency can surely decrypt it if they truly wanted to
They can't. Not using any known technology. Even basic encryption like AES256 would take 10^50 years on a supercomputer. That's not even getting into quantum-resistant encryption.
Which has nothing to do with encryption?
I mean to my knowledge the US hasn't tried to force encryption backdoors recently?
You're being needlessly pedantic. If it makes you feel better, I can ask the question again:
How do they apply pressure?
Listened to the first episode and I don't have any negative feedback. You might consider running your audio through Auphonic. Really great hands-off editor that can take quality to another level. But it's fine as is.
They don't care. It's not their information and there are no consequences.
More intimidation tactics.
We have heard this non-sense before, only to find it's trivially easy to connect to your PID.
This is fine.
USE GRAPHENEOS
Probably a better idea to just pick one you like and then figure out how to disable any wireless communication. But this could really in warranty and charging issues.
The new Slate truck is the only one I can think of (not currently in production).
AntennaPod is the obligatory open source client.
How is that a "fingerprint"?
The region that repeatedly insists on backdoors in any encrypted communications?
Garmin has had a similar service for years, it's just text based.