Stored emails are encrypted in any service, the difference from Tuta, Proton, Atomic, etc, to Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo and others, is that they don't have the decryption key. But yeah, technically any of them could make a copy of unencrypted emails you receive and send (the later don't even need to since they have the key), but they can't do it retroactively. Proton had a few third party audits checking their services, but afaik Tuta hasn't.
You are talking about End-to-End Encryption. Zero-Knowledge Encryption means they don't have access to your mailbox because they don't know the password, it's not stored on their server, they only know the hash it generates (which is used to verify you know the password, but the password itself is never exposed).
Even though they can't get inside your mailbox they know all the incoming and outgoing metadata (addresses of emails sent/received) so they know your traffic (there is no way to encrypt metadata anyway, it would be like giving a letter to a mailman but not telling him who to deliver it to), but, say, court orders them to give access to your mailbox, they have no way of doing it, only someone with your password can read your emails.
They can't read your emails though, Tuta uses zero-knowledge encryption, it was something else that got you flagged. Did you send a lot of consecutive emails?
After 25 years, Mercosul and EU finally have a free commerce agreement. Lula have been meeting all EU leaders and trying to get it done, but I don't think he would have done it without Trump fucking the EU relations with the USA.
Do you know the Barnum Effect? In my country they did a funny test on TV once, they'd do people's astrological charts and then read one chart to them, and every single person was like "Woah, this is so about me! That's totally me!" and then they would be like "Oops, I picked the wrong chart, this one is actually Hitler's"
Hmm, I have a blink and a gecko browser on desktop and mobile, and open the site on both to check how it's being displayed :S
I hear a lot of people complaining about sites breaking on Firefox, but I never experienced that, only on secure forks that removed canvas, webgl and webgpu.
I have a few static sites as well and I use JS. The only thing I noticed changing, that can push elements weirdly, is scroll bars, buttons, the default audio player... but you can edit those with css to look similar on both browsers.
Are they sure it isn't the pastor themselves that are trying to increase their output of incendiary sermons asking for donations by adding AI-made sermons?
Did France government really say anything or was just one cop in one newspaper saying they don't like GrapheneOS because they can't crack it?That being said, Fediverse and GrapheneOS are hardly comparable, and no company anywhere will try to cover for you in an investigation, in any country if the police shows up with an order to check acc creation info and logged IPs the service will comply or will be responsible for whatever you are using it to do.
For torrented games, just don't delete the installation files?
For GOG, burning your games on DVD is not even piracy. According to the EULA, you are legally allowed to keep one backup copy.