Skip Navigation

User banner
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
MotoAsh @ MotoAsh @piefed.social
Posts
0
Comments
175
Joined
1 mo. ago

  • Another L for bigotry

    Jump

  • Ya'll are just describing why religion always fails at it's purported task of making a better populace. When rituals and ceremony take over from the psudo-philosophy and self-reflection, you get BS pointless rules like these that then go on to harm all other aspects of the religion.

  • Why are todays pc and mobile games so bad?

    Jump

  • Not just investors. Capitalists in general. The stock market just makes it much easier for capitalists to pretend that profit at any expense is wise.

  • What's an uplifting fact that might counter the doom of our current reality?

    Jump

  • The universe does not render to nothing that which came from something.

    The very laws of physics dictate that 'you' do not disappear. Time is a human projection of our understanding and perspective. Our times of death are merely a location on a much grander tapestry that we are absolutely a part of. While we may not be infinite, we are real.

  • What's an uplifting fact that might counter the doom of our current reality?

    Jump

  • Scuba diving.

    It might make it worse, not being able to eat the pizza without tasting the water you're in and having to deal with removing and replacing your mouthpiece.

    ... or latrine/septic cleaner on the job. I'm not enjoying pizza in a shittank.

  • What's an uplifting fact that might counter the doom of our current reality?

    Jump

  • but their money is, and it's already sequestered away. Their mere existence is a problem that lasts longer than their lifespan.

  • What's an uplifting fact that might counter the doom of our current reality?

    Jump

  • Why do you think they're all desperately pretending that LLMs are gen AI? They want to secure their revenue without having to care what the plebs do.

    and we both know governments both today and throughout history protect the rich and money over people...

    You're both right. You are in that their influence will wane, but they're right in that it won't be fast or pretty.

  • What's an uplifting fact that might counter the doom of our current reality?

    Jump

  • He didn't have a clear vision. He had contradictory promises all over the place.

    You must be a troll if you're dumb enough to think all that tripe.

  • What's an uplifting fact that might counter the doom of our current reality?

    Jump

  • Effectively they do. When even mild criticism can get you thrown in jail, the difference is minimal in effect...

  • What's an uplifting fact that might counter the doom of our current reality?

    Jump

  • But many other fascists have now been given power by TacoBoy. I don't think any singular person's demise is ever going to be as "uplifting" as many are dreaming...

  • What's an uplifting fact that might counter the doom of our current reality?

    Jump

  • It's getting their works digested by Amazon's LLMs.

  • Trust me bro

    Jump

  • Does it if you know, though..?

    IMO, even involving location and private data in the digital ecosystem that includes a centralized LLM is a very unwise thing to do.

    We both know that LLMs can and will spit out ANYTHING in their training data regrdless of how many roadblocks are put up and protective instructions given.

    While they're not necessarily feeding outright personal info (of the general public, anyways) in to their LLMs' models, we should also both know how slovenly greedy these cunt corpos are. It'll only be a matter of time before they're feeding everything they clearly already have in.

    At that point, it won't just be creep factor, but a legitimate doxxing problem.

  • trolly rule

    Jump

  • But what if it's just a copy of that relation R? Is it the same mind in a new body? Or a new body that's so utterly similar that it will merely continue on believing it's the same person?

    I don't like that philosophy, because it pretends the mind exists outside of the brain.

    Does the difference of the literally unobservable matter? Yes absolutely to the person stepping in to the machine! Sure, everyone else doesn't have to care, but the teleported person sure probably should care, so that philosophy does less than nothing for answering the question.

    He's basically saying, 'I don't care if you die if I cannot tell if the new guy is different.". Saying, "I don't care" is not an answer.

  • trolly rule

    Jump

  • IMO, even the digitally sent person could be the original, depending on the philosophical concepts being applied (same ship of theseus style questions). If it's just the process of reading your atoms to that level of detail that makes you disappear, and the only information that is literally 'you' is being transferred over and reconstituted in a similarly one-way-by-function process, it's almost more of a phase shift to digital and back than a copy. Pretty much just side-stepping matter's inability to travel without acceleration.

    If the machine is basically 'digesting' the person only to send over the results for reproduction, though... that's definitely a copy. Pretty sure Trek describes their transporters as the latter? They're definitely killing a bunch of people in that show. ha Though to answer it with any kind of conclusive result, I'd think we'd need a technical description for how it works, and it cannot exist, so... lol

  • trolly rule

    Jump

  • That's why the late showers are "wisdom" teeth. Your brain is finally getting big enough to shove 'em out of there.

  • trolly rule

    Jump

  • Y'know, the more I think about free will as a religous concept, the more I'm convinced it's supposed to be an allegory for how to treat others, like a more convoluted Golden Rule. The source was shifted to "God" simply to make the garbage people that don't normally care about others hesitate before they just ignore others' advice on how to treat people.

    The reasoning is pretty simple: Nobody can actually do anything they want because others will interfere. Individuals restrict others' freedom all the time. If you're restricting others freedoms, you're doing an even worse version of judging others. The Bible pretty clearly says to leave such critical stuff that idiots can screw up in God's hands, because idiots can and will screw it up.

    Same with free will. Peoples' freedom is, according to religous teachings, a gift from God. They describe such things as "from God" solely because idiots respect their flavor of Sky Daddy over other human beings.

    If it's actually a gift from God, then it makes little sense that humans can simply remove a gift an all-powerful diety bestows. So... either historic humans are insanely stupid and bad at logic ... or it's actually an allegory for not trying to control others so much.

  • Twitter has figured out why Hasan Piker showed his dog's definitely-not-a-shock-collar so quickly, and held it so awkwardly when he did

    Jump

  • Because most people conscously or subconcously expect better treatment towards pets than other fellow humans. It's like children. Unless you're an Israeli or conservative looking at a brown child, nobody stans child abusers.

  • We interrupt your happiness to bring you this special message from our sponsors

    Jump

  • Not all advertising is equal. Yes, increasing awareness pays off.

    That doesn't mean your product putting a one minute ad up on YouTube that gets pasted in front of a 10 second cat video will have a positive response.

  • Apple Banned an App That Simply Archived Videos of ICE Abuses

    Jump

  • lol so you defend that which you do not even use and that which you do not undertand? What a joke...

    My hatred is anything but blind, and you calling it such is sealioning beyond belief. I love your hypocrisy... An Apple user without even using Apple products... Truly, your lot in life is more dreary than you could ever admit.

  • Smöl

    Jump

  • Definitely wrong, although I do not have a collegiate off-hand understanding of biology to really fully decribe it.

    But it comes down to what does a "cell" mean in biology? Even your case in point specifies an object with many cells in it.

    Cell membranes don't use simple diffusion to transport chemicals across. That's the entire point of a "cell". It's a defined region that at least attempts to control its own various chemical balances. Cells do have many gates that allow many molecules across, unfortunately including many viruses and prions. Unfortuntely, cell walls are also not impervious to truly toxic chemicals, either, so a "cell wall" still can absolutely break down with minimal effort with the right chemicals. They do attempt to control their own balances though, including basic ionic content. That's the whole point. The attempt.

    I really have to ask... Why do you think humans aren't so big on the scale of life? Your perspective really come across as human-centric. Not "bad" by itself, but still wholly incompatible with reality.

    The thing that does change in relation to diffusion at scale is the necessity of circulatory and respertory systems, which is a massive order of magnitude or few increase in complexity than cells.