Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)KA
Kache @ Kache @lemmy.zip
Posts
0
Comments
7
Joined
1 mo. ago

With LLMs, censoring internet at the router level has become trivial

Jump

  • What about encrypted DNS?

    • Please settle a debate. A kid in the womb is better off listening to stuff like cat in the hat so it can be read to it at bedtime? Or history of the world during the womb and read it later?

    Jump

  • The content likely doesn't matter, but I read it helps the baby recognize the parent's voices (esp the Dad's, Mom already gets a lot of time), and it can also help them get a head start on recognizing the phenomes of your language.

    • r/worldnews leaves out a few words.

    Jump

  • Only let the OP add new title candidates, but then use reddit voting to select the replacement?

    Probably still game-able, though

    • 2% Wealth Tax on Just 3,000 Billionaires Could Raise $250 Billion a Year: Nobel Economists | Common Dreams

    Jump

  • Realistically, even if enacted, would be tricky to implement, and would definitely have to be done slowly not to shock the economy.

    I think this also means creating a system where companies beyond a certain size cannot be privately owned and must be governed by large "committees", since beyond a certain evaluation, concentrated controlling entities would be forced to sell off.

    Long shot research and development (e.g. think employing thousands for a decade, like drug development) could probably be harder to get started, but at the same time less corruptible due to spreading out power.

    I do think spreading out power can be a good thing, but I have to acknowledge that would probably make the government much more powerful (i.e. corruptible) by comparison.

    Also, a lot of wealth is tied up in non-liquid assets, so these billionaires would be forced/incentivized to hold more liquid value -- who'd want to hold something that can be capped one year only to have it fall the next?

    So on one hand, a ton of market value disappears from the economy due to increased supply, yet on the other a ton of hoarded value is unlocked to circulate in the economy.

    Anyway, don't know where I'm going with this, I'm not an expert by any means.

    • In languages which use complex written characters (such as Chinese's logographs), is there an equivalent to English's "text speak" shorthand?

    Jump

  • When gaming online, Chinese players sometimes type "99" or "9898", and I learned it means "go! go!" or "let's go!"

    • Time travel doesn't work unless you also have teleportation. If you travel to the past/future, Earth will be in a different position in its orbit, and you'll die in space.

    Jump

  • That video is super, super wrong, and nowhere even close to "just a different perspective". To demonstrate, Mercury and Venus should periodically come between the Sun and Earth, but that'll never happen in that model.

    • We need to stop pretending AI is intelligent

    Jump

  • Isn't it pretty clear that human intelligence isn't only high-dimensional statistical modelling by showing how even small children have "context windows" vastly surpassing even the most advanced and resource intensive models, and their brains only take a few snacks every few hours to power?