Fascinating. I spend about 2% here in Germany, for two good bikes (which I bought used) including professional maintenance, plus a monthly commuter rail pass. No car. Roughly a four-day week.

Yes, but I do have a question.

Do you want to troll?

Cause I can think of several reasons why big companies like e.g. OpenAI would like to disrupt communities like these.

It is not by chance that the 2008 financial crisis was unleashed by the bankcruptcy of an investment bank which was trading with shaky housing loans, leading to an investment bubble, which in turn was pinched just after prices for oil had passed 140 dollar per barrel. Which lead people to reconsider the rationale that you would live cheaper if you resign to living far away from work with super long commutes. It was the pheripherical suburbs far away from cities where that calculation broke down first, and houses became unmarketeable first.

That situation was then somewhat stabilized with quantitative easing and super cheap credit money, which also made energy extraction, and thus oil prices cheaper. Which essentielly means collectively borrowing money we can't pay back, to finance energy and a way of living we can't really afford. And states are still pumping more money into that.

You were insinuating that cycling in the rain like here does not exist or is not possible.

That's bullshit.

Which leads to the question why are you telling such things?

And why I immediately think in astroturfing when I read such statements - I have seen them many times always when the discussion was how to reduce car dependency. And what raises my suspicion is that they come as (incorrect) fact statements, while at the same time they mostly emotionally appeal to discomfort - especially to people which do not know the situation by own experience. The thing is that when moving on a bike, factors like rain, cold or warm weather are actually much less uncomfortable than when you are standing outside, waiting for a bus, or sitting in a car. Because the movement warms your body in the cold (you need far less clothing than when hiking), and in warm weather the movement through the air boosts evaporative cooling.

So, the whole statements looks to me as if geared toward dissuading people which lack own experience.

Video

That's several bikes per second. One hour has 3600 seconds.

as pedestrians will loiter in bike lanes for some reason.

I have read the explanation that humans walking perceive themselves primarily as humans and not as participants in traffic which have to watch out constantly for faster objects.

This makes a lot of sense to me since the "humans walking" mode of locomotion has evolved for millions of years without faster things being around.

While 'trolleybuses' are electric buses which get power by wire. They have the advantage that they are far cheaper to set up than trams, while providing less capacity.

Yes. But Vienna was designed to reach that, by traffic planners like Hermann Knoflacher. The consensus is that for changes in motor traffic, both pull-factors (like better walking spaces and better public transport) as well as push-factors (making less efforts to make driving comfortable and subsidize it less) are needed.

While much of that has to do with a car-centric American culture, there are real growing pains as cycling ramps up. Pedestrians already on the watch for cars now have to look out for bicyclists — not all of whom follow traffic laws. E-bikes present a particular challenge. Because they go faster and have more mass, they’re more dangerous both for cyclists themselves and for pedestrians in their way — especially illegal, fast e-bikes that are more moped than bicycle.

I have noted this when I visited Copenhagen last year: Cyclists are so much more relaxed and careful than they are in Germany. Especially, they go significantly slower, so that children or old people do not end up in an uncomfortable position. In contrast, in Germany, when I do in summer my commute along the river, there is no space and still people seem to train on road bikes at full speed on lanes that are no more than 70 centimeters wide. I think this is a cultural thing - some people swap the car with a bike, but then continue biking like they have been driving.

To put it in a short phrase: We not only need to get rid of cars, but also of car culture.

The first thing is that I’ve got an nVidia card.

This can well cost you a lot of extra frustration and time. You have been warned.

I think this has indeed elements of addiction.

Here is an experiment for fun: Measure a place with a distance of 1.5 miles, or 2 kilometres from a place well-known to somebody who uses almost exclusively a car, and ask him/her how long it takes to walk there.

Meanwhile, auto insurers are raking in record profits after hiking rates.

Well, rising premiums seem also related to climate change...

I think what would also be helpful is to provide permanent car parking spaces for those residents which are not disabled only at a minimum walking distance of about 10 minutes walking. This would reduce a great deal of unnecessary very short car trips - and also make residential areas much nicer.

Edit: Just for curiosity: Can somebody explain the downvotes?

Not a problem. Stations where a lot of people board and unboard at the same time have sometimes platform where one side is for boarding, and the other for unboarding. Plus, trains can have more doors per car.

One should include bikes and also costs per person per journey. Will probably need logarithmic scale.

the problem with bicycles is they are not weather proof. if it’s cold or hot or stormy or hails, bicycles suck.

You can certainly use bicycles in many kinds of weather. Because this is a world-wide forum, we need to be a bit more specific about the weather conditions:

• You can ride bikes when it is raining, even heavily so. (Here in Germany, this happens less frequently than 20 years ago). Good rain clothes help with that.
• You can also ride a bike during stormy weather, though one needs to be a bit more careful. Said that, I have lived in Scotland and Northern Germany (which often has stormy weather in winter), and have been blown off my bike only a single time in, wait, over 40 years. And no, I am using bikes all the time - I never had a car.
• You can also ride bikes in quite cold weather - they are popular in Finland even in deep winter. What you do need to do then is to protect your extremities, especially hand and feet and also the face, against the cold. I use bar mittens (like these) for long rides in temperatures below - 10° C, and I find them super comfortable. If the road is a bit icy, studded tyres are great! In Germany, not much people use bikes in icy weather but this is mostly due to bike paths not cleaned from ice by the municipal road service, snow is melting and freezing again for days so that they can not be used in a safe way. In Finland, things are different, and bikes are used even in deep winter, as a preferred mode of transport.
• The limit is probably for extremely hot and humid temperatures, like are frequent in India, East-Asia, and some parts of Brazil. Here in Southern Germany, we rarely have above 33°C and perhaps 60% humidity, and being on the bike is still more comfortable than using a bus with poor ventilation, and much more comfortable than using a car without AC. Actually, I have now read several times of incidents in summer where AC was broken in very full trains, but never of any health damage a person took because of commuting by bike in hot weather. That's because the movement provides ventilation by the headwind, and ventilation cools (at that European level of humidity). (One more funny thing is that in Germany, AC in cars became only popular in the last 15 years or so. Now, some people are saying that on a bike, you "get too sweaty" for working in an office in Summer. That's funny, because entering a car without AC on a warm day was always like entering an oven, but nobody ever suggested to use the bike instead because it was less hot. All in all, that is just one of the many ways how people use made-up arguments to rationalize decisions that maximize their comfort, but are bad for their health).

then on top you’re excluding people who are not physically fit enough to use a bicycle for more than 5 minutes. and that includes people with disabilities of all kind.

I think you are making a mistake here, and this seems to affect the central point of your argumentation: You are assuming that somebody is demanding that a whole city uses either bikes or public transport, in an exclusive way. In reality, bikes and public transport are superb complements. Reasons for that include speed, economical factors, travel time, last-mile connections, urban life and more. Last not least because public transport in metros is two orders of magnitude more expensive than bikes, and therefore always limited in capacity. You can see this is way: Each time you are using a crowded metro, bus or street car, when you could as well go by bike, you are taking away a place from an perhaps elderly or ill person which really needs it.

In contrary, cars are not helpful for disabled and elderly people: Not only they can often not drive them, but they take away walking space and make their transport less safe.

so you still need public transport options anyway.

Of course, nobody was saying that one should exclusively use bikes! This is a strawman argument.

on days with bad weather, you can expect that at least 90% of people are gonna prefer public transport, so you have to size your buses and trams large enough to carry the full population anyways.

That depends a lot on culture and also on whether you have safe bike paths. Generally, normally rain, warm or cold weather does not impede cycling. What is making the difference is safe infrastructure and ways. One can see that clearly from the enormous rise of popularity of using bikes in Paris, once the necessary safe infrastructure was there.

so now you already have full public transport. at this point, why bother with bicycles, apart from the fun and physical exercise people get?

Again, bike and public transport are great complements - public transport will always be needed for elderly / disabled / ill people, and commuting or travelling large distances, and bikes are more economical, faster, and more convenient for shorter distances.

that’s why i conclude that bicycles are only for recreation/sports, not actually for mass transport.

Looks like you never have lived in a city or culture where the bike is a normal mode of transport. I guess you are American?

(And yes, I am aware that a community like this one which discusses alternatives to fossil-free transportation, might be frequented by poorly-informed people and also be targeted by astroturfing and 10-cent armies directed by the fossil fuel industry... one sees this in every discussion on climate protection.)

Could be due to device profiles. Maybe they need some OS support.

Yes its because it is a youtube video. Who has time to watch videos (and likely being sucked into a swamp of crap) if 200 words of text can in all likelihood convey the same information?

Stop recompiling your C code just to change a number.

That sounds stupid if you can do the same with getenv() and atof(), which are part of the system C library.

• Austria's Ministry of Economy has migrated to a Nextcloud platform.
• It's the latest move in a European trend to shift away from Big Tech.
• European governments and agencies want to control sensitive data.