Copyright law needs to change with things becoming public domain much sooner than the currently do, but...
If a bunch of billionaires want to profit off someone elses work by using material to train AI, they can bloody well pay fairly for that use, or accept if the owner of that material refuses to permit/license them.
The basic premise that there is some universally accepted 'need' to train ai models is just not one i can see as valid.
I don't think I understand this.
I don't actually want to pay with my phone, so thats a non-problem to me, but when I can access my bank with a browser on any pc in the world, why do they need attestation on a mobile? I dont see why the requirement is inconsistent.
Now he needs to tell them that any use of UK based facilities for aggression against a sovereign state will result in an order for all US personnel to gtfo until their adminstration can behave.
I find it irritating that element's website promotes their origins as the creators of matrix but doesnt anywhere actually give names that could be researched. Yes i could get the directors details from Companies House but frankly its just easier for me to move on and not use their software.
good example that works well on a data minimisation basis when they the need is for some indication of age appropriated trust. There are limits to it though. - to actually satisfy age-gates/verification they would also need to tie your identity to the ownership of the card, and ensure the card isn't some kind of under 18 prepaid affair.
This is ridiculous and clearly shows both nefarious intent and complete disregard for the GDPR and it's core principle of data minimisation. There must be a simpler solution to this - maybe through attestation from a trusted third party who has already (legitimately) verified the user's identity - like a bank. Imagine a user creating and providing a token that allows a one-time request through the open banking standards to receive an attestation on whether or not the user is over 18 - without disclosing the users actual dob or any other personal information except who and how the attestation was made. Not sure if it would even be necessary for companies to store precisely when the attestation was made if the banks themselves record the event.
is there a list of 3rd party apps?
being in the 'wrong region' and the linked page just says: "Chats with third-party apps are only available in select regions and may not be available to you."
Changing my VPN to an EU country gives me the DMA version which still doesn't state which apps they have actually integrated with.
seems to me that one way federation is the right answer/solution. Let fediverse users retreive threads content, but dont serve up fediverse content to help meta keep threads users locked in.
Came to say the same thing. But then again I shouldnt be surprised, bankers and politicians seem to really struggle with concepts like 'conflict of interest'
Can we get some legislation that forces all her books to be stamped on the cover with the words: "This book is brought to you by Epstein money and the suffering of women and children trafficked for abuse and rape"
For the first time in my life I actually think burning books might be more appropriate than reading them.
I'm probably paranoid but I don't trust google apps to not be reporting usage back via play services even if internet access is disabled for the individual keyboard application.
If you don't have play services then no problem ... but bank apps 🙄 🙁
Seems like a strong argument for dedicated hardware to me. Something card shaped 😉