Skip Navigation

User banner
User banner
FriendOfDeSoto @ FriendOfDeSoto @startrek.website
Posts
1
Comments
484
Joined
2 yr. ago

Joined the Mayqueeze.

  • Locked Removed

    TIL men are approximately four times more likely than women to die by suicide in Western countries; whilst in China, roughly as many men as women die by suicide.

    Jump

  • Unlike other governments who are (more) honest.

  • Locked Removed

    TIL men are approximately four times more likely than women to die by suicide in Western countries; whilst in China, roughly as many men as women die by suicide.

    Jump

  • This has to fall under the category of "never trust a statistic you didn't forge yourself." I'm confident without looking that the amorphous Western countries don't all count suicides and attempts the same way. And for China you would have to trust official numbers or generate your own because the one thing the leadership does not like is looking bad in the international community.

    The other question I would have is this ratio based on absolute numbers or per capita. The reason why I ask is that China has a massive gender imbalance, a blast from the past when the one - child policy was in play and millions of female embryos were somehow aborted. And here I would also assume that official population numbers may not be entirely correct to make the generally known problem within the country look less severe.

    If there are more men in absolute numbers, there will be more male suicides, some of which one might attribute to the ripples downstream of that very same imbalance.

    Whoever concluded this may have accounted for all the pitfalls in their study. And the result may be fantastically accurate. But we oughta be careful and keep more than just a few grains of salt handy when we hear about something like this.

  • TIL if you funneled the water from Niagara Falls through a straw, it would probably destroy the planet.

    Jump

  • And if we have found a way to reinforce a straw, then we will have found a way to reinforce the planet as well. Danger averted.

  • How do you think early humans survived without water bottles? Did they just live next to water sources all the time?

    Jump

  • Dehydration is but a secondary concern as you're being chased by a sabertooth tiger.

  • NSFW Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Yes, we are. Please stop masturbating. Thanks.

  • How do you deal with renewing ID/official documentation?

    Jump

  • That's great, I wasn't aware of that.

  • Accessibility is the only moral use that Generative AI can have nowadays

    Jump

  • If you're only looking at the tools everybody can get a hold of, I agree. I think if you look a bit further, you will find medical diagnostics that can hopefully top human detection scores and that's worth pursuing as well.

    I don't see any good reason why the general public needs to have access to most of the models today. Most people just play around with it - and I don't see the value there. When we get the final tally, we will have made the climate crisis worse and caused droughts with all the thirsty data center consumption. All so Alexa can remember what you said two queries ago and you can animate your childhood teddy in the Ghibli style.

  • ich🐟iel

    Jump

  • Ich würd ja sagen der is 2 huso, der huso huso

  • "workers" is a dehumanizing term

    Jump

  • I agree that women are still being objectified and that's bad. I don't agree with workers being dehumanized by being referred to as such. "Workers of the world, unite!" was a big rallying cry. For some people, it's an identity-establishing part of life that they're using manual labor and not fart into a desk chair all day. They take pride in being working class.

    If by referring to a group of working folks is dehumanizing then we cannot talk about people like housekeepers, street sweepers, nurses, or engineers either. They're people too. And I don't see "people with job X" catching on in the language either.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I'm not sure what point that is. My inkling is that OP doesn't live in the States.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • No, you're not overreacting. You know you and you can point at serious consequences now. Keep the license valid if you can - you don't know what life still has in store for you and you want to keep your options open. But by all means toss the keys to somebody else.

  • How do you deal with renewing ID/official documentation?

    Jump

  • The American fear of a proper ID system is puzzling to me. It's constant fear mongering of overreach by the man and not enough appreciation of the benefits. The first one is a self-updating voter registry that eliminates the process of registering or having to check on your registration to make sure you didn't get knocked off for no good reason. All people need to update their home addresses when they move. Another benefit is - if implemented well of course - that everybody could have a 2FA-quality chip in their pocket to allow for many services to be done reasonably safely online. The dreaded lines of the DMV come to mind. Another benefit is you could prove very quickly who you are, especially if fingerprints are on the chip, to counter mistaken identity arrests that may or may not have been instigated by a so-called AI.

    So the government knows everything about you, sure. But it's not a one-sided deal. And frankly, even if the government did not have this information on you before it turned tyrannical, it would ID you as a possible malcontent in no time. Your data is already available for sale on various data broker sites.

    I realize that me preaching the benefits of a proper ID system to the Americans in times of 47 and ICE raids is a bit wonky. I am not going to speculate if the self-updating voter registry could've prevented 47. And ICE under 47 might find its job "easier." But from what I've read and heard they haven't exactly been detail-oriented public servants. When the rule of law breaks down everybody gets effed. And so-called illegal immigrants also have phones and use the internet so their information was also available for sale before stable genius returned to the orange office.

    Of course there are dangers that need to be addressed. Access to the database needs to be tighter than a sphincter and every query needs to be logged. Every system will be abused. Checks and balances need to be there, ideally with a right to find out who looked you up and for what reason for everyone. I'd prefer a system embedded in law over internet data brokers.

  • Do you ever use words from different countries?

    Jump

  • Med al ret!

  • NSFW Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I think both Apple and fictitious closed Android would be way more interchangeable and data from within would be more portable. Developers would get more of a cut. The saving grace for Google in the real world is that they can do Apple shenanigans while pointing at the open-source availability of Android and not get dumped in hotter antitrust water. If we only had two OSs and both were closed especially regulators in Europe would hit both of them much harder. And like tougher environmental restrictions on cars became the de facto US standard for everyone, the forced equal playing field (the EU guys LOVE an equal playing field) would over time make shit better for all users everywhere.

    If there was no Android I think we would have a long list of failed attempts to build one that all fail because every company wanted to build their own walled gardens, and didn't get enough traction. iOS probably would have succeeded thanks to Apple marketing budgets and their somewhat cultish follower base. But I suspect it would have followed more the initial Steve Jobs idea of doing most stuff in browser; the app revolution wouldn't have happened. So there would be a big iOS share and then the lower 30% or so would be fractured into other walled gardens for poor people. One result of that would be an earlier agreement on a RCS-like texting solution and not just in the States but everywhere. Because more players would have a stake in seamless communication because stuff like WhatsApp (a reaction to high texting rates, mostly in Europe) and blue/green bubblr iMessage did not happen.

  • TIL Donald Trump, Ernesto "Che" Guevara, and Boy George were all born on 14 June.

    Jump

  • Pineapple on pizza is always hotly debated, but do you think Pineapple belongs on a burger?

    Jump

  • You do you et bon appetit. I'm sorry if I got hung up on that for no reason.

  • As far as I can ascertain, Peter Thiel* is the 103rd richest man on the planet, with a reported net worth of $20.5 bn US. How and why does his influence reach farther than so many others?

    Jump

  • Maybe he likes being a tad unpredictable. If I had to choose if I wanted to be his friend or if I wanted to be stuck in an elevator with him for an hour, I'd clearly say neither, thanks. History will probably record him as a stirrup-holder of full born fascism.

  • Pineapple on pizza is always hotly debated, but do you think Pineapple belongs on a burger?

    Jump

  • I don't like "belong" here. Pineapple is food. People like it, or like it in certain combinations, or they don't. Highly concentrated uranium or arsenic really don't belong in food. Pineapple is not the same as uranium.

    If you've ever been a student or cash strapped you've eaten various uncommon combinations of food. You didn't care what belonged together or not. And neither should anyone care in this regard. Outside of poison and allergies, we don't need to be paternalistic about telling people what to eat or not. People who get internet mad about pineapple on pizza need to reevaluate their life choices.

  • As far as I can ascertain, Peter Thiel* is the 103rd richest man on the planet, with a reported net worth of $20.5 bn US. How and why does his influence reach farther than so many others?

    Jump

  • When you're in the top 5% it doesn't really matter where you rank. You will never have to worry about money ever again.

    He is an oddity that became a tech press darling, i.e. somebody to report on although not everyone liked him, through PayPal and then his Facebook investment. So he occupied more press real estate than other, long forgotten silicon valley or hedge fund founders. But the fact that he was a founder and successful more often than not makes him the embodiment of the American dream. The immigrant kid that didn't enherit an emerald mine. The investor who didn't have to rely on daddy's wealth as much (or only) as 47. He stands out because he actually finished a degree, not like the Zuckerbergs and Gates of this world. I would say he's more intelligent than some of those people as well, possibly more strategic. And he has opinions, many of which are controversial to say the least. And if Melon Usk is an example of the in-your-face out-of-touch billionaire and Bill Gates an example of the more reserved out-of-touch do-gooder, Thiel is the more reserved out-of-touch do-weird-shitter. He doesn't mind the limelight but he doesn't really seek it. The Melon shows no signs any more of any long-term planning. Like a bladder weakened by ketamine use he just pisses all over everything he happens to stand next to. Gates has an agenda and applies his wealth strategically - and whatever your opinion about the good he actually does - the intention is to do good. Thiel is like that but the intention is to do rightwing libertarian stuff. Quietly, if possible. But there are eyes on him because of his past press "career." And I didn't know about his sexual orientation until quite recently - why should anybody care? - but my guess is that a weird idea spouting gay conservative cannot escape the prying eyes of a, let's face it, predominantly heteronormative press completely. And if you mix this all up you can see why his name keeps popping up. Especially when you consider who presses the diet coke button in the white house.