Permanent border controls and technology-driven surveillance led to a 42% drop in irregular crossings during 2025.
I don't see any evidence for that claimed cause and effect relationship. Just because irregular border crossings fell doesn't mean that the policies worked. The article just claims it does, without providing any evidence whatsoever.
Also, it's mixing a few things up. Irregular border crossings are primarily related to asylum seekers. Skilled-worker immigration laws have nothing to do with that.
Oh, btw. here's a photo of a border crossing nearby. I'm still looking for that dystopian ai powered surveillance here. Can't seem to find it... almost as if it's all just a show for gullible people...
The AfD is pretty much the glue that is currently holding all the opposing far-right factions together. The moment they're gone, there will be a lot of infighting.
Besides the fact that we already had skilled-worker immigration programs for decades, you didn't answer my question. You want the other parties to adopt AfD views "in a milder form". Which views are those gonna be? Asylum? Immigration? Because the AfD is conflating those. And judging from their little meeting in 2024, their politicians made it clear that they also planning to deport German citizens that don't fit their racist ideas.
EDIT: Oh, and before i forget. There are other topics the AfD is going against "the mainstream". I wonder what the "milder form" is there. The topics among others:
Right now, you're doing the gish gallop, intellectual signaling and apparently also something i would call "fallacy gallop". You keep trying to distract from the fact that you have zero reputable evidence for any of this mystical secret knowledge "theyTM" allegedly suppress, by posting unrelated links and accusing others to be blind in a surprisingly eloquent way. That name dropping you do is also highly annoying, and completely unrelated to your claims about suppressed tech or knowledge.
Like, take that magic tesla healing thing. Why don't you post some evidence for that? Is it because that "evidence" happens to be some modern blogspot equivalent blog? Or some book from a known quack?
Side note: Your post would probably be a lot shorter without all that fake-intellectual glitter.
You never stopped to ask if those who tell you these conspiracy theories about Tesla & Co. have their own agenda. For example selling books or some useless "apparatus". And no, citing some fallacies or abusing the thesaurus doesn't make the things you say sound any smarter.
Pay your staff properly