I use AI sparingly to make sure the company-paid subscription is a net loss for the AI vendor.
Hey, it could happen.
Overall, I think it was a bit cookie cutter for an article of this type, but maybe It's just the preaching to the choir effect. Even the fact that he ostensibly quit his job over this stuff doesn't hit as hard as it should, it comes off as if he could have done so at any time but this way he gets to grandstand about it.
Also stuff like this:
It wasn’t a bad job, not by most metrics. It ticked the boxes a job is supposed to tick: good pay. Health insurance. Remote work. Time off. Nice coworkers.
sounds like it should be in a how do you do, fellow workers copypasta.
The poster goes on to whine about how it sucks it's not the same as solving puzzles and they're just QAing all day now and calls the LLM a slot machine, so at least they're not boosting.
Still, they don't go so far as to say they were forced to work this way, so their not even looking at the code either means they're a lazy bum or that it's too far past incoherent to be worth it.
Saw a remarkable take on the pro-AI parts of bsky, that since DeepSeek420.69 can offer the model at like 15% of Claude's pricing, that must mean that Anthropic is operating at an at least 80% positive margin on inference, so things will work out.
In the same thread they complained about Zitron's math being dodgy.
Nadella told colleagues he has started testing Clawdbot
Nadella? Satya I run ten agents to read the news and my mails and explain them to me before sending answers in my place Nadella? Weird he's still around, thought he'd be a bot by now.
Their heart seems to be in the right place, police interrogation will be exploitative and brainwashy with no real consequences for the interrogators, but they sure chose the dumbest possible way to make their point:
Despite the claims of AI evangelists, chatbots aren’t people and haven’t achieved sentience. The differences between a chatbot and a real person, however, make Heaton’s ability to elicit a false confession more disturbing, not less.
"ChatGPT lacks many of the vulnerabilities that make people more likely to falsely confess — like stress, fatigue, and sleep deprivation,” said Saul Kassin, a professor emeritus at John Jay College who wrote the book on false confessions. “If ChatGPT can be induced into a false confession, then who isn’t vulnerable?"
In the same period, the English-language alignment and AI ethics literature produced no substantive engagement. No citations. No rebuttal.
Wow it's almost like alignment and AI ethics studies is less a serious academic field and more like a prank capital likes to play on consumers.
But I also think Zhao Tingyang's take that alignment will make AI evil because people are evil falls too much into the the-people-deserve-to-be-disempowered totalitarian state funny business side of things to be especially influential down these parts.
Ah yes, the everyone in the continent of Africa and parts of Asia is secretly heavily developmentally disabled, my friend Cremieux who's definitely a highly accredited biologistician and not a college drop out who's also a nazi thinks this as well post.
Re the incel stuff I think the regulars grew older so it doesn't come up as much outside the comments, which remain a safe space for this type of whining.
It's not really extricable from the eugenics iinspired bioessentialism that's encouraged there I think.
The MCP thing feels like an I like to leave my keys as a huge bulge under the welcome mat type vulnerability. It seems really easy to not do that and also something that is kind of out of scope for both lock makers and mat salesmen to address directly.
Maybe the MCP ecosystem is such that it's hard to both avoid this and keep the impression that you're doing magic and not just implementing a heavily annotated API, hopefully secured and with specific and well-defined functionality, and also they are all hacks.
Back in the old days, if you got found out for a race science and men's rights internet instigator, there was the slight possibility that you might actually have to deal with negative real-life implications.
Are new data-hungry players entering the market of are we still pretending that shoveling more social media posts to the data furnace will somehow overcome structural limitations?
Unless he specifies his problem was with ostensibly leftist academics being specifically too dismissive of race science and incelist tropes this is worthless, just run of the mill face-leopard schadenfreude.
Also the second half (the what? what's the cut-off point?) of his career has been if anything more mask off, and it's not like he stopped whining about woke after posting a half-hearted disapproval of trump like three days before the election after years of writing about how cool it would be if there was less regulation especially for healthcare.
"All of those embodied agents are seat opportunities," Jha said, envisioning organizations with more agents than humans — each effectively a user that must pay for a software license, or "seat" in industry lingo.
A company with 20 employees might buy 20 Microsoft 365 licenses today. If each employee gets five AI agents, and the workforce shrinks to 10 people, that could still mean 50 paid seats.
Also, it's apparently enough for an LLM endpoint to be paired with an email inbox to be considered an "embodied agent", words mean nothing.
Hey, it could happen.
Overall, I think it was a bit cookie cutter for an article of this type, but maybe It's just the preaching to the choir effect. Even the fact that he ostensibly quit his job over this stuff doesn't hit as hard as it should, it comes off as if he could have done so at any time but this way he gets to grandstand about it.
Also stuff like this:
sounds like it should be in a how do you do, fellow workers copypasta.