Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)O

8oow3291d

@ 8oow3291d @feddit.dk

Posts
12
Comments
265
Joined
3 wk. ago

  • DUI hiring just works

    Jump

  • That would require the Trump admin to have actual written plans for the Iran War. I can reveal that the extent of their planning was just a verbal assertion "attack them, and they will surrender immediately".

  • Masterful gambit

    Jump

  • Jensen Huang says Nvidia engineers should use AI tokens worth half their annual salary every year to be fully productive

    Jump

  • The world is not that simple. There are too many combinations to try. And you risk hitting local maxima, even if doing the gradient thing.

  • Raining death: the Iranian cluster bombs bypassing Israeli air defences

    Jump

  • Cluster bombs hitting civilians is good news to you, I guess?

  • Jensen Huang says Nvidia engineers should use AI tokens worth half their annual salary every year to be fully productive

    Jump

  • I were simply unable to convince Codex to split a patch into separate git commits in a meaningful way. There are things that just doesn't work.

    Still useful for lots of stuff. Just don't use it blind.

  • Jensen Huang says Nvidia engineers should use AI tokens worth half their annual salary every year to be fully productive

    Jump

  • If used by an expect developer, then the combinations are not just random "lucky" choices.

  • Iran denies Trump's claims: 'We reject all negotiations – US has failed and Hormuz will remain closed'

    Jump

  • One common fertilizer is literally shit. So I guess I did worry more about the Iranians hitting literal shit, than the Iranians hitting US Marines... /s

  • Jensen Huang says Nvidia engineers should use AI tokens worth half their annual salary every year to be fully productive

    Jump

  • Well, yes, that is a central point.

    I am a senior programmer. LLMs are amazing - I know exactly what I want, and I can ask for it and review it. My productivity has gone up at least 3-fold, with no decrease in quality, by using LLMs responsibly.

    But it seems to me that some people on social media just can't imagine using LLMs in this way. They just imagine that all LLM usage is vibe coding, using the output without understanding or review. Obviously you are very unlikely to create any fundamentally new solutions if you only use LLMs that way.

    only to find out you didn’t provide adequate requirements for your config.

    Senior programmer. I know exactly what I want. My requirement communicated to the LLM are precise and adequate.

  • Iran denies Trump's claims: 'We reject all negotiations – US has failed and Hormuz will remain closed'

    Jump

  • So fuck the US, but this is not good. This can create a huge economic crisis and food instability, which would create untold suffering among innocent poor people across the world.

    You are allowed to rightfully criticize the US for this war, without applauding Iran sinking ships with fertilizer the world desperately needs to not starve.

  • Jensen Huang says Nvidia engineers should use AI tokens worth half their annual salary every year to be fully productive

    Jump

  • The database was an arbitrary example. A more relevant example would be tenserflow layers in a neural network. As I understand it, you can in some cases get a novel solution to a problem just by choosing a smart enough combination, with the right data.

    ChatGPT absolutely knows how to help doing the grunt work setting up the tenserflow configuration, following your directions.

  • Irony level: expert.

    Jump

  • I am not a lawyer so I don’t risk anything by calling it as I see it.

    So from a moral perspective, that is not how it works. Saying you knowingly know less than other people does not give you a moral license to say more...

    You could just call it "evil" instead of "illegal", and I would have no objection. Why do you insist on the word "illegal"?

  • Irony level: expert.

    Jump

  • The US sub not picking up the sailors after sinking the ship does seem like a straight up warcrime.

    I am done giving the US any leeway with the way they have been acting. Department of War, lethality, and the rest of their garbage.

    Oh, I am right there with you. Fuck the US.

    But I just like randomly flinging around words like "illegal" in the sense of "things I don't like". If we do not require ourselves to make sure what we say is true, then soon we will be no better than them.

  • Supply and demand

    Jump

  • Like, there is a huge focus on inventing and implementing exactly this. I have seen many technical science/engineering articles about the different approaches to make it work. Because it would be amazingly useful. But the solution has generally not been found yet.

    Reality bites. Some stuff is just not possible to make economically. You can't just say "economics of scale" like it is a magic incantation.

  • Supply and demand

    Jump

  • There has to be some solution in use today, since I as a consumer don't have recurring blackouts. I don't know what they are, but they are likely not chemical batteries, and they are likely cheaper than batteries.

  • Judge allows release of deposition videos of 2 former DOGE staffers

    Jump

  • But seriously, what were the arguments given? Inconvenient objective reality is surely not a permitted reason, as you say.

  • Jensen Huang says Nvidia engineers should use AI tokens worth half their annual salary every year to be fully productive

    Jump

  • Even novel solutions are usually built out of smaller common building blocks. E.g. many novel solutions surely use a database. You can make the LLM help you set up and use the database, that your novel solution uses.

  • Irony level: expert.

    Jump

  • It is a fucking warship in international waters - if it is a war, then it is a valid target.

    The US's war as a whole is illegitimate, I agree. So if you want to complain about illegality then argue that, instead of an attack on a legitimate military target inside the war - that is silly.

  • The US bans all new foreign-made network routers

    Jump

  • As I read it, they are scared of the Chinese Communist Party having an "official" back door built in. Not run-of-the-mill criminal bot-nets.

  • Irony level: expert.

    Jump

  • Yes, but Cuba never did this whereas the US attacked a defenseless ship returning from war games and killed 87 Iranian sailors.

    It was a warship in a war. So fuck the US in general, but that is a bad example of illegality.

    The US has also been attacking civilian fishing ships claiming they are narco terrorists summarily executing civilians without trial.

    Yes, that was also illegal. But that was not part of the Cuba embargo.

    The US is doing a lot of illegal shit right now. But if you want to argue that the US is doing illegal shit related to Cuba, you need to actually cite examples related to Cuba.