Treedome 0.5.0: Local Encrypted Notes with Modern Features

This is exactly why I keep all my notes in Markdown and view via Mkdocs.

If you really want to be future proof and interoperable, I suggest you to use something like a git repository + vscode + foam (https://github.com/foambubble/foam). All of the tech is open source and relatively easy to use, especially if you already know git.

Treedome on the other hand can be abandoned. It can be swallowed by the sands of time. It uses a custom file format after all. But because of its open-source nature, as long as you have the code, you can open the notes. But that's a good idea, to be able to export to a plaintext file. You could make a request here if you want https://codeberg.org/solver-orgz/treedome/issues

You are welcome, please do tell about your experience tho, especially what you want to prioritize. Because for me, currently its feature complete.

nope, there are some differences (i use the one from my old posts):

• Not open source, treedome is open source.
• Uses a centralized server to sync your notes, treedome instead uses a single local file which you can sync, move around, however you want.
• Uses graph, treedome is working with trees and tagging instead.
• Uses plugins to add more feature to the notes, treedome doesn't plan to do this. We at least want a complete experience out of the box, with notes files that's fairly stable within a major version. I have to make it stable since the start because I'm already using it for work and personal.

is it this one https://bazzite.gg/? Does it have .deb support? Because if so, you can install it easily because i release it with .deb and nix. If not, you can always compile it yourself using the docs here https://codeberg.org/solver-orgz/treedome/src/branch/master/docs/development/development-setup.md. Please make an issue in the repo if you have any suggestion on improving the docs.

nice, im trying to update it on nixpkgs, will probably make 0.5.1 to fix dependencies stuff in master first tho