Remember me comrades!

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context

1K comments

And when people say they are "anti-tankie", they actually mean that they are anti doing anything about the awareness of systematic inequality that tankie indicates. By definition, someone who is against change/progress is a conservative, so when someone says they are anti-tankie, they are by definition expressing a conservative stance. That is, wanting to do something about systemic inequality is synonymous with having a progressive stance on systemic inequality.
Being a tankie, on the other hand, is not synonymous with being a comunist. Tankies are just one form of communist (militant).
Other way around: communists are just one form of tankies, the word is also used to refer to anarchists and some soc-dems.
- You're spun around, flipped upside-down, and confused as can be.
  Tankie is a term that specifically refers to one particular kind of communism; namely, the kind that supports authoritarian regimes that try to impose communism through the use of force to repress dissent.
  You can be a communist and not be a tankie. You cannot be against progress and be a progressive.
  
  You're spun around, flipped upside-down, and confused as can be.
  Very compelling, but have you considered
  
  Tankie is a term that specifically refers to one particular kind of communism
  No, it's used to refer a wide, vague blob of vibes, just like the word woke. The people who use it can can do use it to refer to all kinds of communists, most anarchists, and anything to the left of Elizabeth Warren in general.
  that try to impose communism through the use of force.
  As opposed to the kind of communism where you ask nicely for revolution? Have you actually read any Marx? I guarantee he was not a pacifist.
  You can be a communist and not be a tankie
  By your own definition you cannot, let alone by a definition of tankie that describes how libs actually use it.
  
  As opposed to the kind of communism where you ask nicely for revolution? Have you actually read any Marx? I guarantee he was not a pacifist.
  You deliberately misquoted me by cutting off the end of that sentence so you could have a nice soft strawman to swing at. The full sentence said
  that try to impose communism through the use of force to repress dissent.
  Forceful revolution by the workers against the capitalist class is a completely different matter from forceful repression of dissent by the state against students and professors.
  
  That doesn't change the context at all. Dissent from the capitalist class is still dissent.
  
  Lol okay, sure, yeah. Only the capitalist class. Got it.
  
  "Marxism is when you capitulate to revolts from a small part of the population, with no concern for protecting the project that the majority supports"
  
  Forceful revolution by the workers against the capitalist class is a completely different matter from forceful repression of dissent by the state against students and professors.
  So you're pro tanks against capitalists?
  
  Can’t eat the rich without some utensils
  
  Tankie is a term that specifically refers to one particular kind of communism
  Nope, tankie originally referred specifically to British labor party members supporting the USSR's actions against the coup in Hungary, and today is used to refer to any anti-imperialist leftist, regardless of tendency. Of course all of you claim otherwise, but these claims are provably empty, as nobody who uses the term today, including you in this thread, bothers to check for the actual political views of the people you call tankie, you see something that may go against the state department narratives that are spoonfed to you by V*ush and the reddit front page or whoever else has done this pseudo-leftist brainworming to you and you start yelling tankie at the top of your liberal, western-chauvinist lungs. A good number of the people posting on hexbear are anarchists and DemSocs, but you will label all of them tankie as long as they critically support China or question the narrative on the new forever war in Ukraine, which to you equals "thinking today's Russia is true communism" and similar nonsense. Your understanding of politics is damaged beyond repair by being socialized as a smartass debatelord who has become entirely incapable of forming judgements not based on learned reflex and of engaging in good faith conversations. I would pity you if people like you wouldn't be such a disaster for the Western left and for anybody in the Global South suffering from the continued imperialism you help enable by fighting the last genuine critics of genocidal US policies that are left in the West. You CIA tool, you psyop casualty, you neocon bootlicker.
  
  I don’t call someone a tankie based on where they post, but in what they post. If you don’t want to be called a tankie, then don’t post tankie shit.
  
  If showing solidarity with victims of Amerikan imperialism makes me a tankie, i'll prefer that over being a white supremacist warmonger who justifies the bombing of brown people in "shithole countries" like literally everybody who calls people a tankie online.
  
  No worries, that’s not what makes someone a tankie
  
  So what if i say "China is far from perfect, but the people there are a lot happier with their government than the Amerikans, they are much less of a threat geopolitically, maybe we should leave them alone because it's honestly none of our business how the Chinese govern themselves"? Is it the usual 50 cent wumao genocide denier tinaman square then?
  
  That's not how the world works in the year 2023. Isolationism just isn't a conceivable possibility. All countries are interconnected, and what's happening in one country influences what's happening in other countries in major ways.
  
  Isolationsim isn't "let's not act hostile towards this country" you absolute ghoul.
  
  A ghoul isn’t “an attractive and intelligent person” you absolute pumpkin.
  
  I'll take being a beloved halloween decoration over being a chauvinist warmonger.
  
  nato narratives only please
  
  impose communism through the use of force to repress dissent.
  All societies impose force to repress dissent (other than anarchist communes I guess, where force is mediated by norms)
  
  even anarchist communes have use of force, those moltov cocktails being thrown at police officers arent non-violent and even recent projects like CHAZ/CHOP had para-police forces setup within them to hold order togther

1045 comments