Remember me comrades!
Remember me comrades!
You're viewing a single thread.
1K comments
-
it looks like the only comments of yours that were removed were for making inflammatory comments about homeless people on public transport in a place you don't live.
-
And it really sucks, because I agree with them (about lemmygrad and hexbear)
-
Dude I was speaking from experience in that post. I live there and took the train daily. Do I need to show you my LA Metro card to prove it?
-
Post your credit card number and DLN while you're at it.
So a mod didn't like a comment you made which was interpreted as encouraging anti-homeless hate. Instead of just moving on you decided to make this about "tankies" despite no one saying anything about Marxist ideology, China, or anything related. I think you're just looking to pick a fight with us because we're dirty pinko commies or something.
-
That was probably a more level headed way to deal with this person than the way too generous effort post I just commented lol
-
-
Show a verification hog pic to continue posting
-
If this was reddit I would say that post belongs on r/confidentialityincorrect
-
-
stay classy, hexbear
-
stay classist,
-
The “show 18 more comments” button below this comment isn’t loading and I so desperately want to see the cope within
-
I love that y'all use that as an insult. It only carries any weight in your own echo chamber, you know that right? No where else on the planet (be it a forum or a physical space) does that mean anything. Well, maybe within north korea
-
maybe within north korea
Don't worry, absolutely no one there is thinking about internet liberals, the DPRK lives rent-free in your head though
-
Lol yeah they're thinking about the coming winter, or the reality that they aren't even allowed to leave their country (for all but the most privileged) unfortunately
-
they aren’t even allowed to leave their country
This is true, do you know who keeps them inside though? The United Nations' Security Council.
[...] the Security Council today further tightened sanctions on the country, severely restricting fuel imports and other trade, as well as the ability of its citizens to work abroad.
-
So when they cross the dmz are they loaded in a catapult and sent back?
-
Hilarious joke, almost as funny as supporting sanctions that kill people because the sanctioned country has a scary ideology you know nothing about.
-
Uh huh. Keep defending them, very impressive. I wonder how the government of nk earned those sanctions?
Indeed their people suffer in more.ways than one.
I'm sure folks worried about food are the ones not finding work abroad 🙄
-
I wonder how the government of nk earned those sanctions?
"We do horrible things to them, but we're the good guys so they must deserve it"
-
I wonder how the government of nk earned those sanctions?
Please enlighten me on why you think that is?
Also do you think the DPRK is a real sovreign nation?
-
-
No they give them lots of money so they can be used as propaganda, like that lady that claimed NK moved trains with people and ate mud.
-
Very few people fleeing the country do it via the dmz. They go through China (and get on a boat) because it's actually pretty easy for them to go to China. Trying to cross the DMZ is liable to get them shot at by troops on both sides because you really aren't supposed to cross without authorization, including southerners going north.
-
-
-
-
-
If "on the planet" you mean primarily the U.S and secondarily the rest of the "west" while excluding the majority of humanity on the planet, then sure.
You're so brainwashed and conditioned into believing you have more in common with some ghoul billionaire that values your life insofar as much as they can extract wealth out of you than your own fellow worker.
-
Obligatory comment that brainwashing is a myth rooted in orientalism and later pseudoscience, propagated by the US in order to make excuses for US soldiers defecting during the Korean War (et al).
-
I mean everywhere that isn't China or Russia or one of their satellites/annexes yeah.
Not sure where you got the billionaire thing, I've never defended them, in word or action. (Living in a capitalist country and needing a job for resources doesn't make me a billionaire apologist)
Liberalism and billionaire worship are not the same thing, same as communism and xi are not the same thing.
To be clear: just because xi figuratively leads a communist country doesn't mean this policy is perfectly communist.
Same thing goes for billionaires existing in a liberal society.
Lastly, the existence of either doesn't invalidate the tenets of either ideology
-
None of that makes any sense
-
Xi is no different than any other billionaire shit head most of the communist party top leaders use there position to gain control over the state controlled businesses
-
The cia literally called him redder than red and unable to be corrupted by money lmao
-
-
This is incoherent. Xi has administrative control (or influence) over state enterprises, but he isn't getting profits or stock options from them, so there are no grounds for calling him a billionaire
communist party top leaders use there position to gain control over the state controlled businesses
This is like saying you became a police commissioner to gain control over local police cars. Yeah, an explicit part of your job is that you can direct them, but the claim is so tautological that it looks like you are saying something else. It's not like Xi will retain control of these enterprises after he leaves office.
-
Xi first started geting so much hate from the west because he actually started purging communist party members for being too involved in the private sector. If he was encouraging the bourgeoisification of the CPC he would be hailed by the west.
-
Tell me you know nothing about the PRC without saying you know nothing about the PRC
-
We can agree on that
-
Of course you agree on something that's bullshit about an AES
-
-
-
-
-
maybe within north korea
Nice whataboutism you centrist liberal tankie!!!
-
That must be why you felt the need to respond to it.
-
This is a message board, where we reply to each other.
By your approach: why did you feel the need to defend him? See? Silly.
-
This is a message board, where we reply to each other.
By your approach: why did you feel the need to defend him? See? Silly.
-
This is a meesage board, where we reply to each other
-
This is a massage board where we reply to each other see silly Billy 😜
-
-
My pronouns are right next to my username, and you still can't get them right. Real fucking classy.
-
I literally can't see them in voyager
-
Didn't know that, but my username has girl right in it, so still no excuse to assume I'm male.
-
- A handle does not imply gender, I've been around since early IRC and it's never been true.
- I referred to you as "y'all" when I replied directly. When I replied later I didn't even look at your name again, or remember who you were. I replied to "shimmering koi". Is that a fish person? Obviously not.
- I fucking hate tankies but I have zero issue with any gender, pronoun, sexuality, race, ethnicity, etc. If I ever had to talk to you again, I'd be fine to refer to you as whatever you want. But I wouldn't remember you because this is a anonymous social media platform and identify is meaningless.
- I forgot to block you in the first place lol
-
-
-
-
-
-
I am pretty sure "classist" is seen as a valid insult even among radlibs, and many other people believe in equivalent terms ("elitist" is not too far off)
-
Referring to "lib"
-
That's even sillier, since American parlance is definitely not universal and in most countries the colloquial meaning of "liberal" is essentially that of a market-loving centrist
Also, obviously, real-world American leftists use it too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cdqQ2BdgOA
-
Again, to millions and millions a "market loving centrist" is not an insult
-
You say "again," but that's a radically different claim from "this is an insult nowhere in the real world". Even in neoliberal states it's often an insult!
-
imagine not being insulted by "market loving centrist" -
And to billions more it is, so going by consensus...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
We try our best
The hexbear promise is that anti-homeless rhetoric will continue to be bullied
-
Unironically hell yeah we do
-
-
1045 comments