The Nuclear Trolley Problem: How One Man Holds Eight Billion Hostage
The Nuclear Trolley Problem: How One Man Holds Eight Billion Hostage
The Nuclear Trolley Problem: How One Man Holds Eight Billion Hostage
17 comments
-
-
Cool. Now cite a single source and dont use AI to "help" you write it.source cited. AI making it harder to relate to this information as a human still sucks tho
-
There's complete books on the subject cited in the Wikipedia article.
-
I think most nuclear-armed states would use their nuclear weapons if someone was trying to destroy them completely. That's very different from claiming that if anyone tried to enact sanctions, arms embargoes, ICC warrants against Israel, or otherwise interfere with the genocide, Israel will nuke the world.
-
-
-
the trolly problem involves a choice and i doubt very much that any of the leaders of the governments could stop the genocide would ever chose if they were given a the choice.
17 comments
This is false. The west helps because it wants to. The west helps because "israel" acts as a military garrison and outpost to project power across the middle east for them (specifically the US who having totally fucked Europe in trade deals and on many other issues shows themselves to be the master of the entire west). The west helps because they want to help white looking people genocide and colonize brown people because they've done so themselves for centuries and fully believe the "savage natives" narrative against the "civilized Europeans". The west helps because Europe can pretend its holocaust guilt. The west helps because deep down many want all the Jews over there and not back in Europe because they are antisemitic. The west helps because "israel" ran Jeffery Epstein and probably other pedophile networks to get blackmail material on elites in the west.
The west does not help because they have nukes. The west allowed them to get those nukes. They were "stolen" from the US, the material to start their breeder reactors along with critical knowledge. The US could if it wishes take out "israel" using maximum force but it is useful to the US so it not only lives it is propped up and given bipartisan support while suppression of speech of those against it occurs.
Do NOT reverse the roles here. The west created "israel", they watched idly as it conducted its genocide before it ever had nukes, they supported it, they justified it, they blamed the Palestinian victims. The west is not some victim of extortion here, it created this monster, it supported it, even now without it the entity would collapses.
Agreed 100%
Also, I hate this narrative that, "if only we got rid of the one insane man (Netanyahu), this nightmare would be over."
Israel has had the same goals of ethnic cleansing Palestine for decades, long before Netanyahu entered the picture. Removing him would treat a symptom, but not the problem itself.
@Majestic @Farid The instant reason was so Truman could get elected on Zionazi dollars. By ignoring all of his advisors, he became the first AIPAC queen.
You have some good info in your comment, but I believe the reasoning counters the original claim that the OP is false. Yes, the West created Israel, allowed them to steal and develop technology that resulted in a nuclear rogue state, and continues to supply them. However, I also agree that the circumstances involving Jeffrey Epstein show evidence that Israel is either responsible for, or deeply involved with, a blackmail operation of political elite using pedophile networks and likely whatever else it could. Also, I agree that Israel is currently an illegally-armed nuclear armed country.
Unfortunately, they also have Jericho III missiles with a max range estimated to be 11,500 km (distance to central US from Israel directly). They also have a fleet of Dolphin-class submarines that can be operating along any coastline. Straight from the Jericho Wikipedia page:
Israel is acting unhinged: committing genocide, murdering journalists, settling occupied land, and torturing prisoners (all war-crimes). To quote Israeli General Moshe Dayan, "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother." This is that 'mad dog' behavior. It's a tool that makes people believe they might actually follow through something as crazy as the Samson option. To me, their leadership seams willing and they absolutely have the means. However, this is only possible because of that 'mad dog' image. As soon as people recognize that a 'mad dog' is collared, securely chained, and unable to do them harm, they can continue on without fear.
Israel operates with a policy of deliberate ambiguity. Their possession of nuclear weapons has never been formally acknowledged and they have not agreed to the restrictions outlined in the UN's Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Once they do come clean, and agree to the same terms as other nuclear superpowers, the "mad dog" image will fade. Only then will other countries stop fearing the possibility of being nuked due to the chain of events that would begin with a reversal on global support.
Regardless, I do hope countries in the west take action to stop these atrocities. It would be even better if Israel would come clean and make official agreements with other nuclear-armed countries, but I won't hold my breath. History should judge the west for the involvement in creating this monster. However, at this stage I think it's an understatement to say "the cat is out of the bag." Israel's actions are so atrocious, and they need to be held accountable themselves.