Rule berry

Are they trying to say that AI haters are equivalent to people who can't code?

I suspect it’s more like “use the tool correctly or it will give bad results”.
Like, LLMs are a marvel of engineering! But they’re also completely unreliable for use cases where you need consistent, logical results. So maybe we shouldn’t use them in places where we need consistent, logical results. That makes them unsafe for use in most business.
- Yeah, they should be used to generate text
- There are like twelve genuine use cases and because of the cult of the LLM bro 9 of those are negated by weird blind faith. Two more are crimes against humanity.
I understood this a a vibe coder trying python, the vibe-coding-way.
- I'm not sure their intent, but I follow this guy on bluesky, he's super pro open source and worked on a bunch of Google projects back in the day so I think if anything he might just be making fun of vibe coders

There are zero 'B's in 'blueberry'

Have you never coded on windows file system?

    
>>> "blueberry".count('B')
0

Likewise, instruct the AI to break the word down into letters one per line first, and then they get it right more often. I think that's the point the post is trying to make.
The letter counting issue is actually a fundamental problem of whole-word or subword-tokenization that's had an obvious solution since ~2016, and i don't get why commercial AI won't implement a solution. Probably because it's a lot of training code complexity (but not much compute) for solving a very small problem.

_i _kno _peeps _will _get _mad _but _imma _comment _anyway!!! _u _cnt _stop _me!

i think dis is kindsa real-... vine boom 💥🤨🤨🤨

dis funi got so many - like - sub-layers 🧅

anyway - i believe thad using a rule-based query-interpreation system (like siri or googles query-specific UI) with llms as a fallback gives much improved human-input-handlin-systems.

besides thad - i dun see much use quite yet

(i hope shareholders-chan is fine with thad >~< )

Fully agreed, this is a very clever post and people are just getting antsy about it because it threatens their black-and-white AI opinions
- Sure, but those opinions are created by the fact that basically everyone is trying to cram ai into basically everything, regardless of suitability. Naturally there's going to be massive backlash.
Are you having a stronk?
- no dear lemm world user, no i am not having a stroke.
- Smorty just uses this communication style and they're very nice and sweet and good.
- water u talkin bout?
  EIDT: i do not have schizophrenia, if thats what ur implyin...
A bubble doesn't mean its useless though. It means shareholders think it's much more valuable and profitable that it really is, and the value is mostly propped up by hype.
If there was a trillion dollar investment in python, that would be a bubble.