That’s not the reason we need you for
That’s not the reason we need you for
That’s not the reason we need you for
Cooking can be an art too!
It's much easier to treat it as an art if you do it because you want to, not because you have to.
Like most things in life, really.
Well said 💪
Exactly, I'm not a bad cook, I'm a starving artist!
Honestly, everything that machines can do, there are some people who love doing it, and there can be an art to it. And for each such thing, other humans hate doing it and prefer automation.
Some people love cleaning, but we have robot vacuums and mops.
Some people love cooking and baking, but we have packaged food that requires minimal or no preparation.
Some people love woodworking or glassblowing, but most of our furniture and household items are mass produced.
Some people love managing their own computer or phone, but most people prefer to just let the manufacturer and operating system do it for them.
Some people love growing food with manual tools, but most farming these days is done with automatic machines.
Some people love driving, others can't wait for self-driving cars or prefer public transport just so they don't have to drive.
The list goes on. Anything can be an art.
I don't know what my stance is on this. I think automation is necessary for the sheer quantities we need. I also think passionate professionals can nearly always do a better job than a machine, but it's obviously more expensive and can't keep up with demand.
I guess the difference is that drawing and writing only have value as art. If I don't like drawing I almost never have to do it, but if I don't like preparing food I either suck it up and do it anyway hating every moment, or it can be (and, in fact, is) a serious detriment for my health and well-being.
Right, personally I don't like cooking and would be fine with automating that (instead of just ordering/heating junk food).
The most important thing is not to replace stuff completely, but give the choice to each and every individual person themselves. Great if it's available, also great if you don't want to use it.
And if you use it, don't be a dick and claim it was you who did it.
I guess the main difference in all those activities is when doing something for yourself, as a hobby or relaxing activity, or when doing something as an obligation, or even worse, doing something for others. Even something like drawing can become terrible if you have to stress yourself, follow someone's orders instead of your own style, and have to do it fast to meet some deadline.
love cleaning
Freaks
robot vacuum
That doesn't really work and spies on you. Still requires human intervention.
cooking
Not if you want it to taste good. You're thinking of restaurants.
some people get off on being pwnd
That's a serious problem on so many levels.
furniture
You think i wouldn't like some good handmade shit that will last firever instead of this ikea crap that will come apart a little every time i move it? But i get told my labor isnt worth that. So the old growth wood gets chopped into tiny pieces for my fückyoü cabinets. Still made by people btw. I will dig up William morris and stroke his century dead disintegrated corpse dick til it soaks you in formaldehyde over this.
food is mostoy automated
Nope. You're just wrong about this. It's a seeious problem with these harsh border regimes; no farm labor. People will go hungry.
only have value as 'art'
No.
No one is making an art piece every meal.
No one is making an art piece every art either. See: the original dickbutt comic.
well with that attitude you aren't eating at my place
The robots make the music and art and the humans pack the boxes and deliver the food.
Comrade, why are you sitting and drawing? Are you crazy? The good times are over, it's time to go to a construction site under AI control!
Well, as for our human bosses, who knows, maybe they are just a myth?
I dont want chefs to be out of work either.
Tbh I have a $300 robot vacuum cleaner/mopper that saves me a ton of time. We call it "robama" so we can say "thanks, robama"
The fact of the matter is it's easier to do things purely in the digital domain, like making digital images, or text. The menial, physical world stuff will be automated too, it'll just take longer. Things like a dishwasher, and washing machine/dryer are pretty overlooked pieces of automation we already have.
There is no right answer in art. So AI can do it.
If you're doing it right, cooking is art.
Nah. We algo have developed a lot of technology to clean and to help with House chores. What is expected for us humans is near the bare minimun
[vibrates with jimmies being rustled by mismatched meme format]
Stupid meme, people have already did the artwork they have stole to train their "ai" machines, so basically they say to our face that we can steal and do whatever we want with it but you cannot
Twenty years ago, some savvy engineers created the Rumba. It's a kind of annoying overpriced vacuum cleaner, but you can at least see the edges of a useful appliance.
Ten years ago, everyone was smelling their own farts about the advent of autonomous taxis. And, idk, we can at least pretend we're in the ballpark right now.
Today, it's noticeable how AI feels like a surrender on actual autonomous machines. Like, the idea of doing actual robotics is out the window. We're only going to spend our money on a solved problem - data processing - and see what we can wring out of it.
I do wonder what this will mean in another ten or twenty years.
It’ll get worse and more boring.
there is plenty of work going on autonomous front but its solely focused on means to kill the peasants who try to inconvenience the oligarchs. take a look at palmers anduril industries. there are other such companies based in the confederate states.
There's a lot of salesmanship going on. But whether it really does anything or it just outsources work to a Mechanical Turk or blows smoke up your ass?
Even Lavender AI seems more like an excuse for conventional manual massacre than a real Skynet for Palestinians.
What does Anduril do that the NSA or the CIA wasn't already doing, except maybe putting a thick coat of bullshit on the conclusion?
So this is scary. We already know that POTUS has no quams about using ai to make shit fake videos. I would be surprised if his plan for indefinite term is actually chat gpt plan.
Ps. Chat gpt DOES actively try to manipulate you.
I think mostly it just tells you what it thinks you want to hear. If you push it hard enough to tell you something, it will tell you that. Grok, OTOH, is explicitly trained to try to give you biased answers.
No, it doesn't "try" to do anything. Don't antropomorphise it.
Yeah, that robotics stuff is happening still (e.g. little robot mowers using machine vision for easier guidance).
But you are right that the prospect of advanced robotics gets a fraction of the attention that chatbots get. Trillions of bets on datacenter bound LLMs that can generate images, videos, and text but a relative pittance for advancements that would translate to physical labor..
I get that there's value, but the value proposition seems way out of whack.
It's not hyped in the media, probably because it's Chinese companies doing it, but there have been massive strides towards creating humanoid robotics in the past couple of years. They aren't nearly to the point of being autonomous but there's a simple humanoid robot that's selling for 5900 today.