Resources
Resources
You're viewing a single thread.
214 comments
-
It’s disturbing, how many people eagerly embrace eugenics and anti-natalism as long as they can cite a left-wing cause like ecology as their reason
-
How are the two on the same level?
-
Where did you get the idea that this was malthusian? Hickel advocates for a more efficient distribution of resources, not to cut thr world population in half so gringos can keep their 4 cars and lawn.
-
Antinatalism is a strawman slur against anyone that questions the viability of infinite growth.
-
So what is calling anyone who has a child a breeder?
-
Why are you asking me?
-
Because I'm curious what your opinion is, and you've made a point of speaking on a very closely related topic.
-
It's a diversion to another topic. No thanks.
-
What does antinatalism being a slur have to do with the topic at hand?
-
It looks to me like that same feeling toward any population concerns are the clear sentiment of the op, even if they don't state it so openly. I guess you didn't see that? No sense trying to beat this to death, we're seeing different things.
-
Well, it looks like you're seeing two side to this topic and I, and possibly the op, see at least 3.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I thought maybe someone was capable of answering a reasonable question to support their position, assuming they had already read the article. Apparently I have to do that work for them?
-
-
-
-
Gee, I dunno, maybe everyone having 3 or more kids in the long term will lead to overpopulation issues we cannot resolve even with improved technology.
-
214 comments