1w ago

Thank god the debt got blown up so that suppressors are tax free

You're viewing a single thread.

319 comments

I mean. You really dont even need one. It's not a James Bond movie. You can still hear the shot from miles away lmao.
- I'll be the devils advocate here and say that it is so much more pleasant to shoot with a suppressor. Both for you, and everyone else around.
  Personally, in this modern age. There's not a lot of reasons to NOT use one. It's not even that expensive to thread hunting rifles. I think it cost us ~150€ excluding the suppressor.
  And I say this from the perspective of a licensed hunter. (And I'm not even american)
  But yes. 27 of them is quite ridiculous
  
  What are you shooting at?
  
  What I'm shooting at isn't relevant. What is relevant is that it's significantly quieter. A gunshot is quite distinctive and can be heard over several kilometers. It can cause unnecessary stress for a lot of animals who, justifiably, are terrified by the sound. A suppressor will drastically reduce the range of the sound.
  Let's say I want to shoot in a new sight, or see how a new bullet flies over various distances. It is highly appreciated by everyone. Humans and animals alike, that I'm using a suppressor.
  An added benefit is also that the recoil is reduced
  
  ... Just curious. Guns are not legal where I'm from. You seem to have strong opinions on guns, so I was curious about what you're shooting at. But ok 🙂 good luck to you and you guns
  
  There is a big difference between guns and guns. I don't know where you are from, but are you sure that you are not even allowed to own a hunting rifle for hunting?
  I wouldn't say I have a strong opinion on guns. I suppose that might be subjective but I don't consider myself a gun-nut or anything. If you're just curious, the answer is deer and wild hog, but mostly wild hog. For one they're invasive, and secondly, I think they taste really good, so win, win. But it's a lot of work, not the shooting part, but afterwards to take care of the meat and all. You need to send it in for testing as they could have parasites that are dangerous to humans (even when cooked). I would like to hunt moose at some point but I'm not really in any rush, it's also highly regulated.
  As my opinion on guns, I think they should be allowed where it's reasonable, provided the person have a valid weapon license. I see no reason for full or semi-automatic rifles in civilian hands. I'm pretty sure some semi-automatic rifles are legal. But I disagree with it. And it's possible they will ban them soon. I know it's possible to get license for pistols. But it's very rare. You are not allowed to have them for self defense.
  
  America is pretty unique with guns compared to other developed countries. Probably from the UK, where carrying a knife could get you on trouble. 2A keeps us gun owners in the sport.
  
  You can get in trouble for carrying a knife here in Sweden too. Unless you can prove you carry the knife as a tool in your job or hobby. Still, that doesn't mean you can carry a knife when shopping at IKEA just because you're a carpenter.
  
  You seem to have strong opinions on guns,
  oh yeah he's a raging gun fetishist.
  there are normal people here, this is not representative of the average person.
  
  or you could just put plugs and cans on your silly head and - oh wait - you're gonna do this anyway if you have half a brain, even with a suppressor.
  so it's all just cosplay kit huh?
  
  I'm not even sure where to begin with you. You could have learned something, added a new perspective to your view. Instead, you choose to come in here and just hurl insults.
  Believe it or not. A Suppressor drastically reduces the sound of gunshots. Which is quite nice for everyone that lives within 4km of where you are shooting. Including every single animal that lives in the woods since they get, justifiably, incredibly stressed when they hear a loud gunshot.
  And as a hunter, you are not allowed to hunt if you don't have access to a dog trained in tracking. Which means that most hunters have a dog, and bring them with for hunting. And if wanting to reduce the sound to better protect the dogs hearing and ensure they don't develop tinnitus. Then I'll gladly be a "half brain with a suppressor"
  So no. It's not a cosplay kit. It's a consideration for wildlife, dogs, and people that live in the immediate area.
  
  . You could have learned something, added a new perspective to your view. Instead, you choose to come in here and just hurl insults.
  just tired of dickless cosplayers who want to complete tier sets. so you can be more sneaky when you creep around the woods, murdering animals you don't need to eat because you're a sad little person who needs to kill in order to feel alive.
  
  You're doing an awful lot of projection here. You clearly just want to be angry for the sake of it.
  No one has a suppressor to "sneak around" in the woods. I already explained why it's practical and useful.
  I could explain to you, why "Nuisance wildlife management" is an important part of maintaining forests, so that everyone can enjoy more houses and furniture, built out of sustainable materials. Or maintaining crops so that we can all enjoy a fresh harvest of vegetables, potatoes and carrots.
  But I doubt you care to broaden your horizon beyond finding new ways to be angry.
  
  funny how all these things were possible before suppressors were cool.
  fuck we used to plink .22 at varmints all afternoon. somehow we managed, the crops were fine...
  funny how times change. but nah you need a fucking AR with all the tacticool bullshit because yer safety....
  I don't need to project shit, sporto, you're plenty pitiful all on your own.
  
  Funny how it was possible to grow potatoes 200 years ago before tractors were cool.
  You're not gonna take down a wild hog with a .22.
  You see a term such as “Nuisance wildlife management” and think it's about shooting rats or something. If you don't know what something means, you can just ask, or google it. You don't need to guess.
  The only thing you are right about is that times change. And that's a good thing. These days the availability, reliability, and quality of suppressors are really good. There is virtually no downsides to use one on a hunting rifle. Simply great for everyone.
  I've stated in other comments on this post that I'm fully against semi automatic rifles. But keep making assumptions. You're doing great!
  
  so you're rocking, what, .300 blackout bolt action with some enormous can on the end as your 'wildlife management' tool?
  yeah that's not the average gravy seal. cool edge case bro. have a cookie.
  
  .30-06
  And yes the suppressor is pretty large. That's kind of the point, won't be much noise reduction if it's tiny.
  having a suppressor on a hunting rifle isn't an "edge case". It's quite common these days. Like I said. We don't want to blow out our dogs eardrums.
  All of this, just because you couldn't comprehend that suppressors have practical use, rather than your preconceived notion that they're just there to "look cool".
  
  We don’t want to blow out our dogs eardrums.
  sure, it's for your puppers. uh huh.
  All of this, just because you couldn’t comprehend that suppressors have practical use,
  Oh I know suppressors have use. I was in the military.
  I just think it's absurd for you to have one, porkchop.
  
  I want a suppressor so I can hear court arguments if I somehow survive ICE showing up for my naturalized citizen wife.
  this is the dumbest argument I've seen yet. Open your door with your suppressed AR in your hands and you won't need to worry about hearing dick - those fucking chuds will light you up.
  There's not some moment where you can hold up your suppressed rifle and say "hey guys, I'm a chud just like you!" they don't fucking care.
  what an incredibly dumb argument.
  
  so you're just going to open fire on 'em?
  strange thing to post on social media but these are strange times.
- You must have sensitive ears. 12 gauage shotguns are loud but not terrible with zero hearing protection. This is sitting on the sheet range with 10 people blasting rounds for a few hours.
  One or two shots defending your home isn't going to blow out your ears. Edge cases would be holding a gun close to your ear, which isn't common. I'm not judging anyone throwing a suppressor on their gun, do what you want. But I'm just saying, you're not going to be sneaking around firing off silent shots in the middle of a party. People will know what you're doing.
  
  You are either a deaf idiot, or know nothing about guns.
  Unless you live in some fucking mega mansion where every room of your house is larger than a normal persons entire home, the overpressure and noise from shooting in a confined spot is absolutely cause for concern, and will absolutely cause hearing damage, and possibly even concussive brain injury.
  
  Hopping on the dogpile, he's objectively wrong, says Science™. A "safe" rating is 70 dB, prolonged exposure to 85 dB causes damage, 120 dB "may cause discomfort" and 140 dB is considered the threshold for pain.
  Shotguns average 150-156 dB, rifles 155-163 dB, and handguns can spike as high as 164.5 dB. He's claiming he shoots shotguns without ear pro on a line with others and he's fine, not happening (or: deaf.) What's more, there's no fucking way he's at any sort of range on the line without ears and eyes unless it's in his buddy Jimmy's back yard, even if he's deaf the range doesn't care you still have to follow the rules. His story is a complete fabrication and his "experience" is as well.
  ~~Pics~~ Vids and a hearing test or it didn't happen.
  
  Believe what you want. If you think you lose your hearing from firing one shot at an invader coming into your living room, then you're delusional.
  Do you though, please.
  
  Please go get a shotgun, stand in a hallway, and fire it. Prove us wrong.
  Go ahead. Do it.

319 comments