Skip Navigation

Would you considering watching playthroughs of a game the same as playing that game?

If you've seen my other post on this comm, you probably know why I am asking this. However, even if I did have a PC, I don't think I would have the time and energy to play a game anyway. That's why I'm now starting to prefer walkthroughs/playthroughs over actually playing the game myself. I know it's not a replacement for a PC but it's still enjoyable regardless. Also, my very first exposure to big games was actually through YouTube lets plays in the first place. What do you all think?

30 comments
  • Hell no. The essential difference between games and movies/television or books as a source of entertainment is that they're participatory. The player's choices during interaction affects the exact outcome.

    That's not to say there's anything wrong with being entertained by others making those choices, but they won't be yours.

  • No. Watching a playthrough is completely passive vs. playing through, interactive. Doing the actual playing through will light up distinct brain regions that passive consumption doesn't.

  • Is watching a football game the same as playing a foodball game?

    It will be a completely different experience - but as long as you enjoy it... who cares? You do what brings you joy.

  • It's sometimes better because I myself may not even like the actual gameplay (such as long grinds, which you can skip over in a video if it's not a theatrical cut to begin with), but otherwise wanna see the story.

  • Watching a game be played is like listening to someone read you the script of a movie imo.

  • It's not really the same, but it can be enjoyable in its own way. I watch a lot of Let's Plays, but I tend to do so mostly for games I've already played myself, substituting it for a second playthrough. You can watch it mostly in the background - or skip through the filler - and still get another's perspective on the best bits.

    It's also perfectly valid to watch playthroughs for games you are interested in experiencing but would not enjoy yourself. Very difficult games like Hollow Knight are a common example for this. It will give you an approximation without driving you to frustration - or getting stuck and unable to finish.

    It's never going to be the same though since the interactive element will be missing, and that aspect is the defining feature of games as an artform.

  • It depends on the game, and my familiarity with it. If it's a linear, story-based game where the player doesn't really influence the end result at all, then watching it is just as good as playing it myself, in my opinion. Or if it's a new addition to a franchise that I'm already experienced in, like a new Super Mario game, then watching it is generally just as fine of an experience as playing it.

    But if it's a game that's based entirely around the experience of playing it, like most multiplayer shooters for example, then watching somebody else play may be entertaining, but doesn't substitute actually playing it myself.

  • I mean.. I wouldn't watch a playthrough side by side while playing, but watching a playthrough of a game up to the point I played to after im done playing for the day is a pretty common thing for me :3

    It's a different experience but I enjoy both

  • No, but also I don't find the distinction all that critical. Watching an LP of the original NieR and the Drakengard games is an objectively better way to experience those games.

30 comments