In a scathing dissent, Justice Jackson says the Supreme Court gives the impression it favors 'moneyed interests'
In a scathing dissent, Justice Jackson says the Supreme Court gives the impression it favors 'moneyed interests'
You're viewing a single thread.
In a scathing dissent, Justice Jackson says the Supreme Court gives the impression it favors 'moneyed interests'
It's not an impression. It's a fact.
The newsroom ProPublica found that for several years, Clarence Thomas was paid by a group of Billionaires:
https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-scotus-undisclosed-luxury-travel-gifts-crow
In June, the newsroom ProPublica reported that Justice Samuel Alito accepted flights on billionaire Paul Singer’s private jet right before the Supreme Court ruled on a court case involving Paul Singer’s hedge fund
https://www.propublica.org/article/samuel-alito-luxury-fishing-trip-paul-singer-scotus-supreme-court
Billionaire Paul Singer is a close friend of Billionaire Rupert Murdoch who owns Fox News and the Wall Street Journal.
Here is Rupert Murdoch hugging Donald Trump:
To quote Donald Trump:
“Rupert Murdoch is in a class by himself, he’s an amazing guy,” President Trump said
https://thehill.com/media/5133600-trump-murdoch-relation/
So the Wall Street Journal naturally allowed Samuel Alito to violently attack ProPublica journalists:
The top editor of the Wall Street Journal published a piece attacking ProPublica:
ProPublica didn't mislead anyone. Their piece just won the Pullitzer Prize for Investigative Journalism.
The Wall Street Journal isn't exactly a neutral source of information.
In fact, CBS News once described it's owner Rupert Murdoch as a "friend of Clarence Thomas"
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/movie-on-clarence-thomas-dropped/
The US is dominated a small group of businessmen who are coordinating together to influence courts. It's a conspiracy, but it's not exactly a theory. The evidence is literally all over the place. It's happening in plain sight.
But most people aren't paying attention 😔