6mo ago

UK’s first trans judge appeals to European court of human rights over supreme court ruling

www.theguardian.com

Comments

manxu @piefed.social 6mo ago
This is the stupidest culture war, fought with the stupidest people on one side and a marginalized group that really just would like to live a life without fear on the other. Not even "without fear," because apparently that's asking too much. Just no state-sanctioned fear.
mannycalavera @feddit.uk 6mo ago
It's simply bizarre that Labour have chosen this hill to die on. After the SC ruling, Labour should have come out and said: that given the ambiguity in the law has been resolved but in a way that doesn't account for trans people, we will be bringing forward updated legislation to close the gap. Sort of like the whole Civil Partnership vs Marriage idiocy.
The basic principle should be: don't be a cunt. And then work from there.
- Mr Poletski @feddit.uk 6mo ago
  Labour should have come out and said: that given the ambiguity in the law has been resolved but in a way that doesn’t account for trans people, we will be bringing forward updated legislation to close the gap.
  110%
- Eiren (she/her) @lemmygrad.ml 6mo ago
  
  This would make sense if Labour weren't a copy of the Tories, and Starmer wasn't elected because he was another hard right figurehead running when people were upset with Tories for letting too many BAME and female people into top spots.
  In short, if you want any sort of human rights then blue and red are off the table. Have been since Corbyn was purged.
- IndustryStandard @lemmy.world 6mo ago
  It is not bizarre, it is literally their job to move the overturn window right and only punch left.
SpaceShort @feddit.uk 6mo ago
Let's go! I hope it is successful.
Mr Poletski @feddit.uk 6mo ago
careful, this could be just what reform need to revive their leave the ECHR bullshit.
steeznson @lemmy.world 6mo ago
They could resolve this with more legislation. The 2010/11 equalities act is ambiguous the way it is written so Labour need to pass more legislation to resolve it. "Use the disabled toilets" is not a satisfactory answer.
SpaceScotsman @startrek.website 6mo ago
(aside: I keep messing up with parsing the acronyms ECHR and EHRC.)
I doubt this will lead to anything positive, possibly even starmer aping conservative's desire to leave human rights bodies altogether, but I wish them luck all the same.

9 Comments