You're viewing a single thread.
-
Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
How does one obtain food, shelter, healthcare, a basic sense of security by having a stable and safe living space?
Oh thats right, you obtain all that with money, obtaining those things without money is either functionally impossible for the vast majority of people, or literally a crime.
Yeah, adding an infinite amount of money to one person doesn't meaningfully impact their ability to get those first two layers figured out.
Distributing money such that everyone has those two base layers... is quite literally the foundation for a happy, stable, productive society.
Liquidate the billionaires... assets, of course.
-
This is off topic of the main thread but the chart was eye-opening to me about the order of love/belonging and esteem. Much of my insecurity drives from not having a girlfriend or any intimacy, but the only way to get that is be socially adept, but I'm not because being socially adept is a lower priority on the hierarchy of needs than intimacy.
-
Many, many people feel pressured to get a partner because it basically is a status symbol that conveys that you are successful, likeable, desirable.
...That isn't how healthy relationships work.
People are not commodities you can buy, they are not a reward at the end of a video game questline.
You have to be at a point where you you feel secure enough in your own life and your own personality that you can actually have a successful relationship where both people respect each other's boundaries and don't become resentful.
Ironically, most people who are seeking a mate... because that is a status symbol, because they feel pressured to, because they think that will fill some hole in their life...?
That is actually a major sign of immaturity and insecurity.
Those kinds of people are more likely to end up in unstable, totally transactional, or even abusive relationships.
...
Don't feel insecure or let people bully you because you don't have a mate.
Become ok with yourself first. Stop hanging around people who mock or belittle you, they are bullies, and bullies bully people because they view putting other people down as a way to make themselves feel better about themselves, to gain social clout amongst other likeminded bullies.
I know its especially hard to find in person group activities these days, but there may be some ... sports, in person tabletop groups, volunteer at a food bank or shelter, book clubs... these things do still exist, and if your goal is just general social experience, maybe make a few friends, they can help you out with that.
-
I do have some friends but no relationship. I don't just want a relationship because others have one, I want one because I have an innate desire for a relationship. I want to love and be loved, and make love too.
-
-
-
I like the way you think. Meeting everyone's two base needs at a minimum is a great way to put it.
-
Spawn more Luigis
-
Good old Maslow. This is correct. The first two require money. As a single person without children, I've generally got the first two covered. I can not cover the third and I also feel like any amount of money will not help me either. This is why people with money say you cant buy happiness... because it is presumably at the top of this pyramid when you achieve it all.
-
Liquidate the billionaires… assets, of course.
If it were that simple, then we should just liquidate the billionaires with rifles. They deserve no respect.
Unfortunately, they're just the symptom of systematic issues of capitalist political economy, so without solving that, new billionaires will emerge.
-
Garys Economics on Youtube talks about this and his proposed solution. He's worth checking out.
-
That's what government is supposed to be for. To regulate. Capitalism is like a car, or a train. When under control, harnessed, maintained, directed, it is an amazing engine for accomplishing things. When out of control, it's deadly.
-
Capitalist markets are built off of the idea that people are inherently self serving and the ensuing competition will benefit people with lower prices, better products, etc to meet their own selfish needs. Capitalism uses capital to gain more capital, and is exploitative by design. When a company acts in a way to maximize profits, and appease shareholders, they're doing it selfishly, with total disregard for others or the environment, in a system that rewards their actions. This is quite like psychotic, or sociopathic, behavior.
I just think trying to control this is a losing battle, and what we really need are foundational changes to values, motives, and what gets rewarded and how.
-
Capitalist markets are built off of the idea that people are inherently self serving
You think they're not?
-
I think people are more than that. The point being that nothing is inherently wrong with making individualistic self serving choices except when there is disregard for others. But people can also be compassionate, alturistic, giving, and cooperative, so how about a system that rewards the better parts of human nature?
-
The point being that nothing is inherently wrong with making individualistic self serving choices except when there is disregard for others
Historically, individualism hasn't been a good survival strategy. I agree that self-interest isn't inherently wrong, although I believe much of the things we consider self-serving are ultimately only sane to do once our basic needs are met, and depending on where you are and who you are, those may be at risk soon. There's a reason why people historically formed tribes and villages to survive, individualism is only possible when you have the privilege of an advanced enough society. The capitalist market system, in fact the market system altogether, couldn't come into existence prior to civilization, where society was strong and safe enough that individual enrichment was a viable survival strategy.
This video makes the point I'm getting at more concretely. Can start at 15:55, when they begin talking about historical materialism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nPVkpWMH9k
(tagging parent commenter @Cryophilia@lemmy.world because this also addresses their reply about people's inherent self-serving)
-
-
-
-
-
-
But by giving the poor money we'd be robbing them of their ability to reach self actualization by creatively solving their own problems! (/s obviously)
-