Did sites end up making money from API restrictions?
Did sites end up making money from API restrictions?
Its been some time since xitter, reddit, and other sites began paywalling their API, causing third party integrations and apps to collapse.
I'm wondering, did any of these sites end up with paying customers for the API? Are there examples of third parties paying to continue their services? These sites sacrificed massive amounts of community and developer good will to privatize the internet - how did it work out for them long term?
You're viewing a single thread.
-
I don't know all the numbers, but the point isn't to make money from people paying for API access, but to force people to use their official applications -- which meets their goals of farming more data/advertising money/engagement/whatever.
-
Right, the metrics they’ll look at are hosting costs went down 5% and ad revenue went up 10%.
-
Perhaps I misunderstood. I thought X angle was to get the larger corpo users to buy in such as Nintendo share function, news orgs that would aggregate tweets, universities that used it for research and such. But I agree regarding reddit, definitely wanted to drive users to their engagement ads.
-
The whole Twitter > x thing has never made any sense. Musk misunderstood what he was signing and accidentally lost an uncountable fortune to buy a social media company and turn it from trash to the shit that skinny raccoons would turn down. Seems to be going well though.
-
I'm pretty sure he wanted to harm it before the elections or at least make it more right wing. I think he succeeded in both to a degree, his candidate won and he's getting his reward.
-
-
-
Data farming to teach AI on our personal info and accomplishments.
-