Is the New York Times fuckin' serious right now. (AKA another attempt to undermine Luigi's support).
Is the New York Times fuckin' serious right now. (AKA another attempt to undermine Luigi's support).
Is the New York Times fuckin' serious right now. (AKA another attempt to undermine Luigi's support).
You're viewing a single thread.
The classic scapegoats aren't there this time. Can't blame him being the wrong race, wrong economic class, wrong mentally, wrong physically, or wrong sexually. Now people are actually looking at the issue that caused the "crime" and that's not good to some people.
Pretty successful and well off kid, definitely not just someone desperate and broke they can tear apart, and he's articulating his position against these fuckers. It's really beautiful. A folk hero.
Luigi is deff what the media has fed society as "CHAD"
Not even being ironic here tbh
Now the only explanation why Chad would do this is "he had bad back"
Alright... go on...
FDR was also part of the elite class and he had his own issues....