Oh boy what a beautiful regex. I'm sure it does something logical and easy to understand.
Oh boy what a beautiful regex. I'm sure it does something logical and easy to understand.
You're viewing a single thread.
80 comments
-
Is there a reason to use
(..+?)instead of(.+)?-
Yes, the first one matches only 2 more characters while the second matches 1 or more. Also the +? is a lazy quantifier so it will consume as little as possible.
-
Ah, didn't know +? was lazy, thanks
-
I thought, the +? was going to be a syntax error. 🙃
-
I was like, why specify "one or more" and then make it optional? Isn't that just .*?
-
-
-
-
80 comments