Oh boy what a beautiful regex. I'm sure it does something logical and easy to understand.
Oh boy what a beautiful regex. I'm sure it does something logical and easy to understand.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25ce1/25ce1c24497a3e910162a264aadb43073a2a255c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cd8a/5cd8a58b9519b028dbed2c72d276ea667616fa5f" alt=""
^.?$|^(..+?)\1+$
<answer>
Matches strings of any character repeated a non-prime number of times
You're viewing a single thread.
All Comments
82 comments
Is there a reason to use
(..+?)
instead of(.+)
?3 0 ReplyYes, the first one matches only 2 more characters while the second matches 1 or more. Also the +? is a lazy quantifier so it will consume as little as possible.
5 0 ReplyAh, didn't know +? was lazy, thanks
3 0 ReplyI thought, the +? was going to be a syntax error. 🙃
3 0 ReplyI was like, why specify "one or more" and then make it optional? Isn't that just .*?
3 0 Reply
82 comments
Scroll to top