4个月前

Signal Is More Than Encrypted Messaging. Under Meredith Whittaker, It’s Out to Prove Surveillance Capitalism Wrong

www.wired.com Under Meredith Whittaker, Signal Is Out to Prove Surveillance Capitalism Wrong

On its 10th anniversary, Signal’s president wants to remind you that the world’s most secure communications platform is a nonprofit. It’s free. It doesn’t track you or serve you ads. It pays its engineers very well. And it’s a go-to app for hundreds of millions of people.

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/0QgXq

Technology @lemmy.world

Under Meredith Whittaker, Signal Is Out to Prove Surveillance Capitalism Wrong

www.wired.com /story/meredith-whittaker-signal/

610 169

您正在查看单个线程.

271 留言

Isn’t Signal at least partially funded by the agency?
- No, they found some billionaires to do it 😉
- What part of non-profit and open-source do you not understand?
  Review the source, build it yourself, be happy. It uses well-known assymetric encryption algorithms. Not much your agency could really do here even if they harvest all the traffic from the server.
  
  Was my fucking question about the integrity of the algorithms they use, or was it about who’s been funding the product? Because a quick web search will show you that they did in fact fund it at one point.
  
  And so what? You could be an oil dictatorship prince and donate a billion to Signal. It's not going to compromise it in any way that is not directly auditable.
  So, your fuckin question is misguided. You're "only asking questions" while implying intent.

271 留言