4mo ago

Blocked 🚫

You're viewing a single thread.

81 comments

If someone needs another existental crisis here's a prompt:
Is math universal or is it a system of thought invented by humans and it only makes sense to us?
- All I know is that 1 = 0.9999…
  
  1 = 9/9, yeah
  
  Then how can it be Truth at all?
  
  If 3 * 1/3 = 3/1 * 1/3 = 3/3 = 1
  And 1/3 = 0.3333…
  Then 0.3333… * 3 = 0.9999… = 1
  
  I know how it works, I'm asking how can something so offensive be a universal truth?
  
  If you're offended by truth, that sounds like a you problem.
  
  The universe is not a nice place. It never was, and never will be. This universe is merely a proving ground for the strong to conquer, and the weak to perish. You either offend, or be offended.
- Models. Humans hold models of the world in their minds, math helps you understand and create more complex and consistent models. You always exist in a simulation of your own construction to make sense of the universe.
  My feeling is that no model can ever fully capture a complete description of reality, the information isn't compressible to such a degree that approximations or abstractions can be lossless.
  Most of what we consider to be invention is merely combinatoric novelty.
- How we express math is particular to us, though it'd be commonly decipherable. Math is more and more globally standardized as more of it gets globally acknowledged as "the most useful" way to do math. E.g. place holder 0 vs Roman Numerals. Ratios are conceptually universal to any species that bothers measuring. Quantification maybe less so. Especially if their comprehension of advanced sciences/engineering is somehow intuitive instead of formally calculated.
  If a space faring species has a concept of proportions/ratios, but not individual identity of numbers, presenting Meters as a portion of the speed of light might be a universal way discern the rest of our math. Water as Liters might be more accessible, depending on how they think of water.
  Sets and Axioms are purely conceptually representative and so viable as long as they're capable of symbolic abstraction at all.
- Universal. How else would you calculate or solve equations?
  
  Like our ancestors with goat entrails and a magic talking stick.
  
  The rules are the same. Add 3 to 5 and you'll always have 8. Geometric calculations can't change how they work either. Etc.
- Good thing physicists solved that problem already; if everything is made up and can only be observed through our preconceived notions and there's no way to prove a world beyond them, then it doesn't matter. The universe we can observe is reality and everything beyond that is beyond meaningful definition and is therefore useless, which is how we define "philosophy".
- Math was not invented. It's was discovered.
- Math is definitely universal. The math behind things in science wouldn't suddenly change on different alien planets. Take things like V = IR. That relies on multiplication and division. It's gonna be the same on other planets. The units, notation, etc. will be different but the concepts would be the same.
  
  I'm no STEM major, so I may be way off, but this is how I see it.
  V = IR isn't math. It's a way of defining the relationship and outcome of two specific physical qualities. It says that we combine the resistance of a medium ( R) with the current flowing through it (I) into another ~~joint~~ emergent quality we call voltage (V). We do this because it makes our understanding of the physical world easier to manage since this relationship has helpful applications.
  Math is simply patterns in the relationships of quantities. It excludes any physical units or qualities. In other words, math is the art of counting.
  
  Historically it was also the art of making precise drawings.
  
  I think you're misunderstanding my point. I'm not saying the relationship of V = IR means math exists, what I'm saying is that because that relationship factually exists aliens would have a way to quantify that relationship. Because of that they would have a way to express the concepts of multiplication and division.

81 comments