The debate gets interesting sometimes

Yep, not voting is unironically pretty much the same as voting for the party you least want in charge.

Because you're making it that much more likely.

Don't throw away a right that your ancestors fought for, as it may result in future generations no longer having that right.

Hitler's government was a popular government; the vast majority of Germans preferred the rule of gangsters to the effort of thinking and doing for themselves. They abdicated their franchise.
[...]
The former Berlin businessman I referred to earlier told me that he blamed his own group, people with the time and the money and the opportunity to know better, for what happened to Germany. "We ignored Hitler," he said. "We considered him an unimportant fellow, not quite a gentleman, not of our own class. We considered it just a little bit vulgar to bother with him, to bother with politics at all."
They thought of the government as "They." The only possible route to a clear conscience in politics is to accept political responsibility, either as an active member of the party in power or as an equally active member of the loyal opposition.
—Robert A. Heinlein, Take Back Your Government
- Similarly, MLK saw "the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice" as the biggest impediment to civil rights.
  The bottom line is that being secure enough in your position in society to think you don't have to engage in politics, or that you can afford to vote your principles instead of tactically, is itself a form of privilege. Those sorts of privileged people think themselves neutral or uninvolved or maybe (in the case of professed leftists refusing to vote Dem as a protest) on their own third side, but the reality is that they are the right-wing authoritarians' greatest ally every single time.
  
  Lol imagine thinking "moderate white" doesn't perfectly describe the majority of people walking into the 2020 primaries and voting for Joe Biden.
  
  You're not wrong about the primary, but you are wrong to conflate the primary with the general election when it's the latter that we're talking about here.
  
  Lol so I'm "radical" in the primaries when I don't vote for Biden but I'm "moderate" in the general when I don't vote for Biden?
  That's not how labels work sir.
  
  The POTUS, from the party most opposed to civil rights act, is who signed it into law, very much so a white moderate more devoted to order. So, I'm gonna take a stance and say MLK was wrong about that one if that was his take before he died.
- That's not how it went, though. It's, in fact, the opposite of how it went. Hitler had relatively little popular support, but full support of the industrial elite. It's blaming the people for the crimes of the elite. "They abdicated their franchise" no, fuckface, half of them voted communist. "We ignored Hitler" no, fuckface, you put him in power because you thought he'd be malleable.
  I'm not surprised Heinlein bought it, though. And I'm not surprised people here are buying it.
- It's funny that both democrats and third party voters will look at your comment and think you're on their side.
Well, mathematically it’s only half as bad.
-1 lesser evil +1 greater evil
Vs.
-1 lesser evil +0 greater evil
- Your math is wrong. You wouldn't be cancelling out the greater evil with the vote for the lesser evil, so its actually twice as bad (or 4x what you were thinking).
  0 lesser evil +1 greater evil
  
  Exactly.
  There is unfortunately no option to wind up with a non-evil result, your only options are greater evil result or lesser evil result.
  By voting 3rd party you didn't reduce the chance of greater evil result, AND you didn't increase the chance of lesser evil result.
Well, I didn't intend on voting for Trump but, fine, you've convinced me.
- Hey, as long as you vote. Everyone should vote.
- Yes, you of course weren't already going to do that. 🙄

Like so?
Also, let's have 'im on the track too.

"Oh, no, I'm not in any of those groups on the track, so I can safely not vote and have a clear conscience as it crushes everyone!"
Then they came for me...
- "All men were created equal"
  IS SLAVE STATE
  always jave been coming for us.
- What a sad misunderstanding of a quote literally describing state enforced genocide. I mean, this is how it starts. Both sides would kill Palestinians. Can't do anything about it I guess. Oh well, best not put my foot down and take a principled stand here.
  Who's next?
  
  You think that Republicans wouldn't support genocide against anyone they consider to be their enemy?
  
  I think that accepting that some groups, like Palestinians, will just be oppressed no matter what is what leads to things like the Holocaust. Saying you can't afford to take a stand on your principles today and draw a line in the sand, but maybe you will tomorrow leads to the situation Martin Niemoller found himself in. It may be too late already, and making a stand won't make a difference, but it's never too early.
  
  And what happens when a significant chunk of the electorate does that? I bet all those poor Palestinians will really feel good about Israel being given the green light to bomb them harder because a bunch of people protested and got a dementia riddled fascist elected.
  These posts are just virtue signalling, because there's never any forethought of what happens after the election to the people being discussed. You can speak from a place of privilege and moralize about the choice you're making, but you're pushing the same tactics that the republicans and alt-right push: don't vote democrat.
  I don't like that I have to vote for Biden, but I actually want to minimize the harm being done to people, not just talk about it on the internet. Crazy concept.
  
  These don't-vote-for-Biden weirdos don't understand that it's wrong to use the idea of a minority to push your political interests in a way that hurts that minority.
  
  But don't you see that only ultrapurism and perfection is permissible, everything sense means we might as well nuke the planet into oblivion because there's zero difference between mostly good with some issues and extreme dystopia
  
  If a significant portion of the electorate did that, Biden would be on the phone this minute applying all possible pressure to stop what is happening. Instead they are playing chicken with your vote. Children died today and every day for the past 8 months because a political party is betting that you'll vote for them anyways.
  Again, the original issue I raised is that it's cruel to quote a man lamenting the fact that he and others like him didn't do enough soon enough to stop the Holocaust. That same behavior is happening right now. But it's fine. We just have to accept it. A few losses for the greater good. I'd bet you don't have any Palestinian friends, but if you do, please let them know I'm the one who's privileged and see what they say.
  
  With all the different issues domestically if you think Palestine even moves the needle for most of the electorate you're kidding yourself.
  News flash buddy. 60% or more of this country actually supports Israel here. I don't but you seem to think aipac is 1. Small and 2. The only pro Israel lobby.
  
  If a significant portion of the electorate did that, Biden would be on the phone this minute applying all possible pressure to stop what is happening.
  Lol, do you even know how elections work? If a significant portion of the electorate voted 3rd party like you advocate, trump would be president elect and all the pressure Biden could muster is worthless without going full J6.
  Instead they are playing chicken with your vote.
  And here you play chicken with their lives by pushing tactics that will get republicans elected because that's how FPTP electoral politics work.
  Again, the original issue I raised is that it's cruel to quote a man lamenting the fact that he and others like him didn't do enough soon enough to stop the Holocaust. That same behavior is happening right now.
  If you're talking about the election, voting 3rd party is just you feeling good about doing nothing while actively sabotaging the cause you profess to support.
  Also, how cruel is it to profess to care about the plight of those suffering while advocating tactics that will only increase suffering? Because that's what you're doing, and it's insane how people do that and pretend they're on the right side.
  I'd bet you don't have any Palestinian friends, but if you do, please let them know I'm the one who's privileged and see what they say.
  That you are privileged and your tactics are actually harming the cause? You're not suffering the result of whomever gets into office, so you don't have to care about how hard they get bombed while you sit in safety and virtue signal about how moral you are while allowing those into power who want to finish the job.
  But hey, I'm not the one who is advocating tactics that will objectively make their lives worse, so I guess I'm just some stooge because I actually understand how electoral politics works.

As someone who for the first time did not vote in 2016. I started voting in the Bush era. I fully agree, no action leads to fascism apparently. Don’t do what I did because I was pissed that Bernie was cheated out of the nomination. Vote or Trump will be back in office.

Doesn't matter where the track leads if the trolley can't get to it. It could lead to rainbows and sunshine, but that isn't where the trolley is headed because there is no possibility that someone other than Trump or Biden is elected president. A few cry babies voting third party won't get some third person elected. A vote for the third track is a vote for a track that will not be ridden.

It could be a little model trolley track going in a loop with no trolley on it.

It makes sense because you can see that the track exists and is better, but there’s no way to actually get the train onto it

the bottom track needs to be shown looping around to the Republican track

Okay, but the guy at the controls needs to be the swing vote on the SCOTUS.