Neofetch development discontinued, repository archived
Neofetch development discontinued, repository archived
🖼️ A command-line system information tool written in bash 3.2+ - dylanaraps/neofetch
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9868/d9868bab030b82a7377cdc02ef2c53676c212ff3" alt="GitHub - dylanaraps/neofetch: 🖼️ A command-line system information tool written in bash 3.2+"
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/13437386
The author's profile says this:
"Have taken up farming."
You're viewing a single thread.
moreeni @lemm.ee Does it have to be developed further? Neofetch looks like a finished product.
96 3 ReplyOtter @lemmy.ca
It would need to keep up with future changes and any security updates
37 1 Replymoreeni @lemm.ee Well, it does its job for now. As for the security updates... Isn't neofetch just a little fancy tool to display data from your system that is already exposed to any process on your distribution? What attack surface does it introduce?
30 2 ReplyOtter @lemmy.ca
Going by the releases, it didn't need updates that often, but it still needed updates to fix and ensure compatibility as things changed
Security wise, I think you're right
26 0 Reply
Treeniks @lemmy.ml according to the Asahi guy, it doesn't work correctly for ARM: https://social.treehouse.systems/@marcan/111018734178152229
I am utterly oblivious to how neofetch works, but it does seem to need updates to support newer tech.
33 0 Replyembed_me @programming.dev
True for all programs
2 1 ReplyReallyZen @lemmy.ml
Works on mine
Édit: (10)... Ah, I see the point, indeed.
1 0 ReplyClassy @sh.itjust.works Doesn't affect me since I'm on EndeavourOS and they discontinued ARM support anyway!
1 2 Reply
exu @feditown.com
It still had issues like handling 8-bit colors in ascii art incorrectly last I checked a few years back, with that pr already being a few years old then.
12 0 ReplyAlex @lemmy.ml I wonder which of the many fetch tools support 24bit terminal colours.
2 0 Reply
𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬 @lemmy.ml
On first sight yes, in reality: no.
4 0 Reply