Does this plan make sense? v3
Does this plan make sense? v3
412 comments
-
Why even have states? Good way to get rid of jerrymandering would be to get rid of imaginary borders. No states, no senate necessary.
-
Something something…. Redraw state lines every 10 years…
-
Because state legislatures should continue to exist. If less populated conservative states want to go down a rabbit hole of far right shit then let them. Just don't give them 2 senators per state to gridlock the states that continue to produce and provide for their population.
-
Then there is no point in having states.
-
That is what is referred to as a false dilemma fallacy. You can have states and state legislatures without the senate.
-
First time I’m hearing about that fallacy, but it seems to imply deceptive intent which I have none. You can also have machine screws in your peanut butter sandwich but it doesn’t mean it makes sense.
-
imply deceptive intent
Nope, it's simply an instance of an argument which erroneously limits what options are available.
-
-
-
-
Why do you think the states govts should continue to exist if they do not have a direct voice at the Federal level?
-
Because states would still get a voice at the Federal level with the House, not directly and disproportionately, but rather through their population who are the ones who create value.
-
The house is representation of the people. The senate is the voice of the states. E.g. senate ratifies treaties.
-
-
-
-
412 comments