rule
rule
according to @Custoslibera’s post
You're viewing part of a thread.
Show Context
179 comments
-
I don't know why people are assuming that I'm in disagreement with them about most aspects of what I said.
I am not implying that cops should not be reformed, or have their funds recalculated (on this point I have no opinion because I don't live in America).
I'm confused to what I missed in responding to the post above. What did I misunderstand?
-
You implied that "defund the police" is some kind of bad "catch-phrase' and it's exactly what needs to happen. It's literally the function of "Dystopian" overpayind them while defunding schools and everything else is DYSTOPIAN & TYRRANY.
-
What the right are hearing is "completely defund the police so only people who want the job will volunteer"
-
You are ignorant. Educated yourself and I ain't your teacher for shit that's loud like that. Next time you fail to educate yourself about something. Shut the fuck up about it. And that's just good advice cuz IDGAF how many people know you're so stupid.
-
What am I ignorant of?
And what did I say to warrant such an abrasive response?
-
The meaning of "defund the police." Now go educate yourself. As I said...
-
-
-
-
-
179 comments