You're viewing a single thread.
-
Please God let this be a humorous post that somehow does not also find a way to manage to come true...
-
I would have bought it if they said ifnot instead, it's the same number of characters and wouldn't require a major parser overhaul to support keywords with a ' in the name.
-
i mean, “unless” tends to be the usual term for an “if not” keyword in languages that implement such a thing
-
Which is awful and incredibly confusing. I hate ruby
-
totally agree; just saying that if it’s GOT to be something, that something should probably be unless… unless . . .
-
And Perl
-
And my axe!
-
-
I find that you need to choose carefully when to use it. Simple cases tend to be alright. Larger, more complex conditions shouldn't touch it.
-
-
-
Yeah, to be clear, I don't like it, I don't like it one bit:-P.
-
If not anybody have time for that.
-
*ifn't*
Oh dear Lord what have I done!? :-P
-
-
-
-
