Threads and the Fediverse | Kev Quirk
Threads and the Fediverse | Kev Quirk
Lots of people on Mastodon have been losing their shit over Threads joining the fediverse, so I wanted to give my opinion on this whole shit show.
Here's a very different take on Threads by a Fosstodon admin.
You're viewing a single thread.
-
Interesting perspective. Yet, server admins actually do have control over who they federate with. People do have control over what servers they use. Why not exercise this control?
My understanding is that one can post things publicly online but still retain rights, including distribution rights in certain jurisdictions.
I don’t think it is out of the question that the fediverse as a whole could make some decisions going forward that would make it more difficult for Meta (or other official corporations) to monetize the things we post with ads in their clients or through training of predictive models.
-
I'm worried that what they'll do is just set up hundreds of instances on various domains (not even necessarily *.facebook.com, or similar) in order to connect and scrape. Banning them would require resources and time people just can't dedicate in the way a megacorp can.
-
If they wanted to do this, they already would be.
-
Why spend the money up front? That's just bad business. They'll only do it if there's real traction in the rest of the verse blocking their shit.
-
Why spend the money up front? That's just bad business.
Yeah agreed. They're building a multi-million dollar social network - why spend all that money up front when they could have just installed small anonymous Pleroma on Raspberry Pi for under 100 bucks if they'd wanted to mine our data.
I don't think fedi is their "target".
-
I don't think fedi is their "target".
I don't think scraping posts is their "target"
FTFY
-
-
-
-
-