Whats your such opinion

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context

1.4K comments

Yes, they are
- Because...
  
  Because they're like the average person, but even worse since they don't have the life experience and understanding older people have.
  We are talking about 12-yo people ffs. Even compared to average adult they're totally removed.
  
  I know 12 year olds that are working part time to help raise siblings, and I know 30 year olds that have never left their hometown or read a book that wasn't required in school. Old people with lots of life experience don't understand data privacy and think climate science is a fad. Young people have a unique perspective on issues like education, social security, and economic investment in the future. Why is that life experience less valid at 12 than at 18? Why is life experience necessary at all?
  Why does intelligence factor into your objection? We don't ask adults to pass a test, nor should we. While I object to you using "removed" to call children stupid, your slur undercuts your own argument. Adults with intellectual disabilities are able to vote without any obstacles or tests. The average 12 year old is perfectly capable of understanding complex topics and making informed decisions. They may not make the decisions we would like them to make, and they may regret their decisions, but again how is that different from any adult?
  
  Calling 12-yo's takes "unique" is certainly one way to phrase it.
  Why is that life experience less valid at 12 than at 18? Why is life experience necessary at all?
  Because you have to set the bar somewhere.
  The average 12 year old is perfectly capable of understanding complex topics and making informed decisions.
  Have you actually met any 12-year-olds? Their understanding of stuff is removed.
  
  I'm happy to debate this with you, but that's the second time you've used a slur disparaging people with disabilites. Hope your day is as pleasant as you are.
  
  What, do you mean removed? Does it mean something other than mentally removed or what's the issue
  
  It is an outdated term for intellectually disabled, and using it when you mean "stupid" is offensive. Intellectual disability is not the same as intelligence. Calling someone disabled as an insult is offensive. People with disabilities are not lesser than you, and it is the height of arrogance to look down upon people who overcome adversity to educate themselves while simultaneously being objectively wrong and demonstrably ignorant on the subject.
  
  Intellectual disability (ID), also known as general learning disability in the United Kingdom[3] and formerly mental removedation,[4][5] is a generalized neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by significantly impaired intellectual and adaptive functioning. It is defined by an IQ under 70, in addition to deficits in two or more adaptive behaviors that affect everyday, general living.
  I'm saying they are intellectually deficit compared even to the average adult. Would you be happier if I called them illectually disabled? Dunno what that even changes.
  
  No, because they aren't intellectually disabled, and calling someone intellectually disabled should not be something you say to insult people. The only difference is that you're not using a slur to do it.
  
  They're not mentally removed, they're just on the same level intellectually

1354 comments