The state of the discourse.

Yeah I did because it was the truth, and there's no need to resort to whataboutism on the Israel/palastiniane crisis of all things. Yes I think 10,000 gazan deaths is awful, to try to just compare the situation based on numbers alone is just another manipulation, that would really only work on children. So you're essentially a bully who tells himself it's for a good cause.

That type of wording is incredibly common with publications trying to keep a poise of neutrality, as it is true that more evidence would clarify the situation. They aren't denying the proof, they're simply saying more will be needed, as any neutral publication would. Here's a much more relavant snippet,

"The White House has backed Israel’s claims, saying that Hamas was storing weapons and operating a command node from Al-Shifa, citing US intelligence."

My bias is trusting telescopes about 100x the strength of hubble pointed back at the earth's surface. I think it's a pretty fair bias but I guess we'll see, I doubt this is a repeat of" guaranteed nuclear weapons" but obviously there's potential.

Everyone is awful in the I/P crisis, an objective observer with the full backgroun will always, always side with Israel. The plight of the modern palastinian child is literally the only objectionable part of this and Hamas will continue to use this until they are replaced with another religious dictatorship.

Because with friends like you, eternally echoing the idea of their complete innocence, there's about a 0% chance palestine is getting any less fueled by holy war anytime soon.