sToP pOsTiNg pOliTicAl mEmEs!!!
sToP pOsTiNg pOliTicAl mEmEs!!!
You're viewing a single thread.
284 comments
-
That smuglord in a recent thread that said "programming.dev doesn't allow politics" certainly allows programming.dev's nonpolitical politics to ooze anywhere I can see a programming.dev user address of origin.
-
"I don't have time to discuss politics, I'm too busy getting the master and slave drives to work together."
-
"That's just technology. Technology is nonpolitical."
-
"Anyway, let me tell you about my next project: the Torment Nexus."
-
"If you don't like the Torment Nexus, just don't draw the ire of Immortal Cyberlord Bezos. Simple!"
-
-
-
I never got the complaints about that. It's not inherently bad to have one thing exert complete control over another thing.. the problem is when you start doing it to people
-
I don't think I've seen anyone with a problem with the computing concept itself, they have a problem with the unnecessarily unpleasant and offensive nomenclature. There's lots of ways to express a leader/follower dynamic that's intuitively understandable. Hell, call them Dom/Sub drives if you want to.
There's just no good reason to invoke historical attrocity that's still ongoing to describe a concept like this.
-
Ok fair point and that is a really funny idea. But afaict dom/sub dynamics aren't complete control and it would be pretty dangerous if they were
-
-
-
-
284 comments