Why the galactic barrier and transporters don’t match real science, and why warp drive might
Why the galactic barrier and transporters don’t match real science, and why warp drive might
You're viewing a single thread.
-
I always thought the least believable part of transporters was that they worked without a pad on both ends.
-
I accept transporting to somewhere without a pad because mumble, mumble, Star Trek science. What I always wondered about was how blasé folks usually were about transporting to somewhere that didn't have a transporter pad. Who makes sure no one is standing in the beam to area. Does the transporter have safety protocols to just not transport if there is something of a certain size in the way? Transporting someone partially into rock has been shown in Star Trek (one instance, PIC s2e9). Weaponized use of a transporter, maybe by overriding transporter safety protocols? That was done intentionally, but still.
-
Even if the area was clear when the process started, what is stopping some space tumbleweed from blowing in there right after it starts?
-
If the safety protocols fail, resulting in a space tumbleweed hybrid, then Division 14 steps in. D-14 will send the affected to a medical spa on Endicronimas V, where they are pampered and tended to like a precious gem. (Lower Decks, "Much Ado About Boimler" s1e7)
-
-
-